The Forking Paths of Digital Humanities in Asian Studies

Abstract This article responds to the “Digital Humanities in/and Asian Studies” forum, situating it within broader genealogies of Asian digital humanities and arguing for a multilayered approach to understanding its histories, networks, and organizations. We offer two complementary trajectories: first, tracing the historical intersections of Asian studies and computing—from early initiatives such as the Munkwa Project and the China Biographical Database to the development of regional collaborations and digital centers—and second, examining the institutional and organizational infrastructures that have shaped digital humanities communities across Asia. Moving beyond project- and tool-based analysis, we call for recognition of Asian digital humanities as a deeply interconnected, globally significant field that both challenges and extends Euro-American frameworks. Our reflections highlight the importance of historically informed, relational, and inclusive approaches to studying the evolving landscape of digital scholarship in and about Asia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Asian Studies
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00219118-12042117
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Forking Paths of Digital Humanities in Asian Studies

Roopika Risam, Javier Cha
The Journal of Asian Studies
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

The Forking Paths of Digital Humanities in Asian Studies

Roopika Risam, Javier Cha
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article responds to the “Digital Humanities in/and Asian Studies” forum, situating it within broader genealogies of Asian digital humanities and arguing for a multilayered approach to understanding its histories, networks, and organizations. We offer two complementary trajectories: first, tracing the historical intersections of Asian studies and computing—from early initiatives such as the Munkwa Project and the China Biographical Database to the development of regional collaborations and digital centers—and second, examining the institutional and organizational infrastructures that have shaped digital humanities communities across Asia. Moving beyond project- and tool-based analysis, we call for recognition of Asian digital humanities as a deeply interconnected, globally significant field that both challenges and extends Euro-American frameworks. Our reflections highlight the importance of historically informed, relational, and inclusive approaches to studying the evolving landscape of digital scholarship in and about Asia.

The Journal of Asian StudiesVol. 85(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.