Implementation of robot-assisted spine surgery in an academic center: workflow, learning curve and perspectives

Surgical robotics represent a significant advancement in healthcare, enhancing precision and safety in operative procedures. While widely used in neurosurgery, visceral surgery, and urology, its adoption in spinal surgery remains in development. This study reports the implementation of robotic-assisted spine surgery within a neurosurgical department, focusing on the learning curve, workflow integration, complications, and prospects. Successful integration requires a dedicated technical infrastructure and thorough training-both theoretical and practical-for the entire surgical team. Collaboration among surgeons, paramedical staff, and biomedical engineers is essential to optimize outcomes. We used a table-mounted robotic system (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Medtronic), with surgical planning based on preoperative, sub-millimetric bone-density CT scans to ensure personalized care. From November 2022 to May 2023, we included 32 patients with an average age of 58 y/o (SD 15 (19; 87)) for a total of 204 inserted screws. Degenerative spine represented the main indication followed by tumoral spine. Optimal accuracy for pedicle screw placement was 97 % corresponding to grade A (90.1%) and grade B (6.9%) from GRS. The operating time was of 186.7 min (SD 89.7 (45; 386)) and the average fluoroscopy time per screw was of 3.0 s (1.8-5.5). Installation is a time-consuming step. We observed a trend towards shorter operating times as more cases are operated on. No revision surgery was needed during the study period. Only 2 superficial skin infections were reported, with no other complication. Robotic spine surgery improves standardization, enhances accuracy, and promotes personalized medicine, with potential for further workflow optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurochirurgie
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2025.101741
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of robot-assisted spine surgery in an academic center: workflow, learning curve and perspectives

Pierre Haettel, Boulos Ghannam, Richard Assaker, Malick Sagenly et al.
Neurochirurgie
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Implementation of robot-assisted spine surgery in an academic center: workflow, learning curve and perspectives

Pierre Haettel, Boulos Ghannam, Richard Assaker, Malick Sagenly, Henri‐Arthur Leroy
article en

Abstract

Surgical robotics represent a significant advancement in healthcare, enhancing precision and safety in operative procedures. While widely used in neurosurgery, visceral surgery, and urology, its adoption in spinal surgery remains in development. This study reports the implementation of robotic-assisted spine surgery within a neurosurgical department, focusing on the learning curve, workflow integration, complications, and prospects. Successful integration requires a dedicated technical infrastructure and thorough training-both theoretical and practical-for the entire surgical team. Collaboration among surgeons, paramedical staff, and biomedical engineers is essential to optimize outcomes. We used a table-mounted robotic system (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Medtronic), with surgical planning based on preoperative, sub-millimetric bone-density CT scans to ensure personalized care. From November 2022 to May 2023, we included 32 patients with an average age of 58 y/o (SD 15 (19; 87)) for a total of 204 inserted screws. Degenerative spine represented the main indication followed by tumoral spine. Optimal accuracy for pedicle screw placement was 97 % corresponding to grade A (90.1%) and grade B (6.9%) from GRS. The operating time was of 186.7 min (SD 89.7 (45; 386)) and the average fluoroscopy time per screw was of 3.0 s (1.8-5.5). Installation is a time-consuming step. We observed a trend towards shorter operating times as more cases are operated on. No revision surgery was needed during the study period. Only 2 superficial skin infections were reported, with no other complication. Robotic spine surgery improves standardization, enhances accuracy, and promotes personalized medicine, with potential for further workflow optimization.

NeurochirurgieVol. 72(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Lille (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Lille’s Cardiology Hospital (FR), Centre de Recherche en Informatique (FR), École Centrale de Lille (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.