Chain Ladder Under Aggregation of Calendar Periods

The chain ladder model is defined by a set of assumptions about the claim array to which it is applied. It is, in practice, applied to claim arrays whose data relate to different frequencies, e.g., yearly, quarterly, monthly, weekly, etc. There is sometimes a tacit assumption that one can shift between these frequencies at will, and that the model will remain applicable. It is not obvious that this is the case. One needs to check whether a model whose assumptions hold for annual data will continue to hold for a quarterly (for example) representation of the same data. The present paper studies this question in the case of preservation of calendar periods, i.e., (in the example) annual calendar periods are dissected into quarters. The study covers the two most common forms of chain ladder model, namely the Tweedie chain ladder and Mack chain ladder. The conclusion is broadly, if not absolutely, negative. Certain parameter sets can indeed be found for which the chain ladder structure is maintained under a change in data frequency. However, while it may be technically possible to maintain the chain ladder model under such a change to the data, it is not possible in any reasonable, practical sense.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risks
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13110215
Primary Topic
Probability and Risk Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chain Ladder Under Aggregation of Calendar Periods

Greg Taylor
Risks
Probability and Risk Models
article

Chain Ladder Under Aggregation of Calendar Periods

Greg Taylor
article en

Abstract

The chain ladder model is defined by a set of assumptions about the claim array to which it is applied. It is, in practice, applied to claim arrays whose data relate to different frequencies, e.g., yearly, quarterly, monthly, weekly, etc. There is sometimes a tacit assumption that one can shift between these frequencies at will, and that the model will remain applicable. It is not obvious that this is the case. One needs to check whether a model whose assumptions hold for annual data will continue to hold for a quarterly (for example) representation of the same data. The present paper studies this question in the case of preservation of calendar periods, i.e., (in the example) annual calendar periods are dissected into quarters. The study covers the two most common forms of chain ladder model, namely the Tweedie chain ladder and Mack chain ladder. The conclusion is broadly, if not absolutely, negative. Certain parameter sets can indeed be found for which the chain ladder structure is maintained under a change in data frequency. However, while it may be technically possible to maintain the chain ladder model under such a change to the data, it is not possible in any reasonable, practical sense.

RisksVol. 13(11)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Probability and Risk Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.