Ripples of Global Fear: Transmission of Investor Sentiment and Financial Stress to GCC Sectoral Stock Volatility

This study analyzes how sectoral stock volatility in the GCC region responds to global financial uncertainty shocks originating from the U.S. (CBOE VIX), Europe (VSTOXX-50), Bitcoin investors’ Sentiment Indices (BSI), and disaggregated global Financial Stress Indicators (FSI) by using both the “Frequency” and “Time” domain TVP-VAR based connectivity approaches. The “Time” and “Frequency” domain TVP-VAR results indicate that the Energy, Financials, Materials and REIT sectors experience the highest shock spillover from the U.S. and European equity market uncertainty (VIX and VSTOXX-50) for the overall and long-term investment horizons. Whereas, all the five disaggregated global financial stress indicators and BSI transmit higher shocks spillovers towards the sectoral stock conditional volatility of Energy and Materials sectors for the overall and long-term investment horizons. Furthermore, the “Frequency” domain TVP-VAR approach shows that overall shocks spillovers are higher in long-term and intensified during the COVID-19 period. The Energy, Materials, and REIT sectors’ high sensitivity to U.S.VIX and Euro.VSTOXX-50 shocks calls for sector-specific hedging—such as sectors remain least susceptibility to long-term U.S. and European equity risk shocks such as Utility. Over the long-term and overall investment horizons, the Energy and Material sectors’ position as the main shock recipient from all five global financial stress components and the BSI underscores its role as a volatility hub. Policymakers should enforce stress tests and capital buffers for energy and material focused firms, while proactive liquidity management and commodity hedging are vital during global financial stress and BSI spikes to limit funding and operational risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economies
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13110313
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ripples of Global Fear: Transmission of Investor Sentiment and Financial Stress to GCC Sectoral Stock Volatility

Marwan Mansour, Mosab I. Tabash, Azzam Hannoon, Ştefan Cristian Gherghina et al.
1 citations
Economies
Market Dynamics and Volatility
3.13
article

Ripples of Global Fear: Transmission of Investor Sentiment and Financial Stress to GCC Sectoral Stock Volatility

Marwan Mansour, Mosab I. Tabash, Azzam Hannoon, Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, Suzan Sameer Issa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study analyzes how sectoral stock volatility in the GCC region responds to global financial uncertainty shocks originating from the U.S. (CBOE VIX), Europe (VSTOXX-50), Bitcoin investors’ Sentiment Indices (BSI), and disaggregated global Financial Stress Indicators (FSI) by using both the “Frequency” and “Time” domain TVP-VAR based connectivity approaches. The “Time” and “Frequency” domain TVP-VAR results indicate that the Energy, Financials, Materials and REIT sectors experience the highest shock spillover from the U.S. and European equity market uncertainty (VIX and VSTOXX-50) for the overall and long-term investment horizons. Whereas, all the five disaggregated global financial stress indicators and BSI transmit higher shocks spillovers towards the sectoral stock conditional volatility of Energy and Materials sectors for the overall and long-term investment horizons. Furthermore, the “Frequency” domain TVP-VAR approach shows that overall shocks spillovers are higher in long-term and intensified during the COVID-19 period. The Energy, Materials, and REIT sectors’ high sensitivity to U.S.VIX and Euro.VSTOXX-50 shocks calls for sector-specific hedging—such as sectors remain least susceptibility to long-term U.S. and European equity risk shocks such as Utility. Over the long-term and overall investment horizons, the Energy and Material sectors’ position as the main shock recipient from all five global financial stress components and the BSI underscores its role as a volatility hub. Policymakers should enforce stress tests and capital buffers for energy and material focused firms, while proactive liquidity management and commodity hedging are vital during global financial stress and BSI spikes to limit funding and operational risks.

EconomiesVol. 13(11)
Amman Arab University (JO), Al Ain University (AE), Ajman University (AE), Jadara University (JO), City University Ajman (AE), Petra University (JO), Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.