Acute Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Versus High-Intensity Resistance Training on Markers of Bone Turnover in Young Females—A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial

The present study aimed to determine the acute effects of high-intensity dynamic resistance training (HI-DRT) and whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on markers of bone formation and resorption in young healthy women. Using a crossover design, 17 students of dentistry (26.5 ± 4.0 years, 21.5 ± 2.5 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to begin either with HI-DRT (five exercises, three sets to repetition maximum) or 20 min of non-superimposed, low-frequency (85 Hz), intermitted (6 s impulse/4 s impulse break) WB-EMS. The study outcome parameters were total Procollagen Type-1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Type-I Collagen Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide (CTX), which were sampled immediately prior to and 15 min post intervention. ANCOVA was applied to determine the main effects, i.e., differences in pre–post changes in CTX and P1NP between the interventions. No participant was lost to follow-up or reported adverse effects related to the exercises. Briefly, we observed significant differences (p = 0.019, d′ = 1.19) for changes in P1NP that were maintained in the HI-DRT (p = 0.446) and decreased in the WB-EMS group (p = 0.002). In contrast, we did not observe differences for HI-DRT- vs. WB-EMS-induced CTX changes (p = 0.509; d′ = 0.134). In summary, while HI-DRT provides significantly more favorable effects on bone formation markers compared to WB-EMS, the clinical significance of this finding in predicting the general effectiveness of an exercise protocol on bone strength remains to be determined. (Clinical trials.gov; registration date: 2025-02-06; ID: NCT06813092.)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Osteology
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology5040033
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Versus High-Intensity Resistance Training on Markers of Bone Turnover in Young Females—A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial

WOLFGANG K. KEMMLER, Simon von Stengel, Robert Kob, Barbara Obermayer‐Pietsch et al.
Osteology
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Acute Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Versus High-Intensity Resistance Training on Markers of Bone Turnover in Young Females—A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial

WOLFGANG K. KEMMLER, Simon von Stengel, Robert Kob, Barbara Obermayer‐Pietsch, Matthias Kohl, Michael Uder, Sarah Stimpfig
article en

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the acute effects of high-intensity dynamic resistance training (HI-DRT) and whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on markers of bone formation and resorption in young healthy women. Using a crossover design, 17 students of dentistry (26.5 ± 4.0 years, 21.5 ± 2.5 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to begin either with HI-DRT (five exercises, three sets to repetition maximum) or 20 min of non-superimposed, low-frequency (85 Hz), intermitted (6 s impulse/4 s impulse break) WB-EMS. The study outcome parameters were total Procollagen Type-1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Type-I Collagen Cross-Linked C-Telopeptide (CTX), which were sampled immediately prior to and 15 min post intervention. ANCOVA was applied to determine the main effects, i.e., differences in pre–post changes in CTX and P1NP between the interventions. No participant was lost to follow-up or reported adverse effects related to the exercises. Briefly, we observed significant differences (p = 0.019, d′ = 1.19) for changes in P1NP that were maintained in the HI-DRT (p = 0.446) and decreased in the WB-EMS group (p = 0.002). In contrast, we did not observe differences for HI-DRT- vs. WB-EMS-induced CTX changes (p = 0.509; d′ = 0.134). In summary, while HI-DRT provides significantly more favorable effects on bone formation markers compared to WB-EMS, the clinical significance of this finding in predicting the general effectiveness of an exercise protocol on bone strength remains to be determined. (Clinical trials.gov; registration date: 2025-02-06; ID: NCT06813092.)

OsteologyVol. 5(4)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Medical University of Graz (AT), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Furtwangen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.