Spatial aliasing errors comparison and non-uniform sampling in optical imaging

Sampling is how data is collected, used, and stored in this day and age. Having the correct sampling, not too high, not too low, is imperative for high collection speed, an increase in today's neural network speed, a lower power consumption, particularly when used in real-time on-board feedback systems, and a reduction in overall storage, all while maintaining an acceptable error limit as required (e.g., by a neural network). This paper explicitly shows the aliasing error, an error due to insufficient sampling, compares this with existing aliasing error formulae, and the "2% aliasing error" rule-of-thumb is accommodated. Further, the reconstruction (interpolation) function, akin to Shannon's, for a fixed non-uniform sampling is generated and its aliasing error is calculated and, again, it is compared with its derived aliasing error formula. Finally, a comparison between the two sampling schemes is discussed, showing that uniform sampling is advantageous over bunched non-uniform sampling from an aliasing error perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Optics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.575166
Primary Topic
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial aliasing errors comparison and non-uniform sampling in optical imaging

Jason Mudge
Applied Optics
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
article

Spatial aliasing errors comparison and non-uniform sampling in optical imaging

Jason Mudge
article en

Abstract

Sampling is how data is collected, used, and stored in this day and age. Having the correct sampling, not too high, not too low, is imperative for high collection speed, an increase in today's neural network speed, a lower power consumption, particularly when used in real-time on-board feedback systems, and a reduction in overall storage, all while maintaining an acceptable error limit as required (e.g., by a neural network). This paper explicitly shows the aliasing error, an error due to insufficient sampling, compares this with existing aliasing error formulae, and the "2% aliasing error" rule-of-thumb is accommodated. Further, the reconstruction (interpolation) function, akin to Shannon's, for a fixed non-uniform sampling is generated and its aliasing error is calculated and, again, it is compared with its derived aliasing error formula. Finally, a comparison between the two sampling schemes is discussed, showing that uniform sampling is advantageous over bunched non-uniform sampling from an aliasing error perspective.

Applied OpticsVol. 64(34)
Golden Gate University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.