Test historického myšlení. Projednávání zákona „o potulných cikánech“ z roku 1927 jako podklad pro hodnocení historického myšlení žáků

The study presents and includes a sample test to be used to examine how pupils conceive and reflect on history, including an answer sheet sample and a methodological sheet. Sourcewise, the test is based on recorded proceedings of the 1927 debate in the Czechoslovak parliament on the bill on ‘nomadic Gypsiesʼ; this topic was chosen as it is sufficiently documented by primary evidence and yet handily unfamiliar to the learners. Several subsequent versions of the test and evaluation criteria were made also to reflect the results of two rounds of pilot testing. The authors have used methodology by historians Pavel Baloun and Jaromír Mrňka for the history part and Bloom’s revised taxonomy of educational goals. Their primary methodological inspiration lies in Peter Seixas et al., whose ’One-hour Historical Thinking Test’ was taken into account as well as their overall framing concept of ‘historical thinking’ (as adopted by the didactical project Dějepis+). The test as a whole, as it presented below, is to serve history teaching methodologists as well as teachers for their classrom use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MARGINALIA HISTORICA
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/30298393.2025.3
Primary Topic
Central European national history
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test historického myšlení. Projednávání zákona „o potulných cikánech“ z roku 1927 jako podklad pro hodnocení historického myšlení žáků

Václav Kaška, Petr Sedlák, Peter Sokol
MARGINALIA HISTORICA
Central European national history
article

Test historického myšlení. Projednávání zákona „o potulných cikánech“ z roku 1927 jako podklad pro hodnocení historického myšlení žáků

Václav Kaška, Petr Sedlák, Peter Sokol
article en

Abstract

The study presents and includes a sample test to be used to examine how pupils conceive and reflect on history, including an answer sheet sample and a methodological sheet. Sourcewise, the test is based on recorded proceedings of the 1927 debate in the Czechoslovak parliament on the bill on ‘nomadic Gypsiesʼ; this topic was chosen as it is sufficiently documented by primary evidence and yet handily unfamiliar to the learners. Several subsequent versions of the test and evaluation criteria were made also to reflect the results of two rounds of pilot testing. The authors have used methodology by historians Pavel Baloun and Jaromír Mrňka for the history part and Bloom’s revised taxonomy of educational goals. Their primary methodological inspiration lies in Peter Seixas et al., whose ’One-hour Historical Thinking Test’ was taken into account as well as their overall framing concept of ‘historical thinking’ (as adopted by the didactical project Dějepis+). The test as a whole, as it presented below, is to serve history teaching methodologists as well as teachers for their classrom use.

MARGINALIA HISTORICAVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Central European national history
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Test historického myšlení. Projednávání zákona „o potulných cikánech“ z roku 1927 jako podklad pro hodnocení historického myšlení žáků — Václav Kaška, Petr Sedlák, et al. · MARGINALIA HISTORICA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS