QCBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain-Specific Quantitative Chemistry

Quantitative chemistry is central to modern chemical research, yet the ability of large language models (LLMs) to perform its rigorous, step-by-step calculations remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we propose QCBench, a <b>Q</b>uantitative <b>C</b>hemistry oriented benchmark comprising 350 computational chemistry problems across 7 chemistry subfields, which contains analytical chemistry, bio-organic chemistry, general chemistry, inorganic chemistry, physical chemistry, polymer chemistry and quantum chemistry. To systematically evaluate the mathematical reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs), they are categorized into three tiers: easy, medium, and difficult. Each problem, rooted in realistic chemical scenarios, is structured to prevent heuristic shortcuts and demand explicit numerical reasoning. QCBench enables fine-grained diagnosis of computational weaknesses, reveals model-specific limitations across difficulty levels, and lays the groundwork for future improvements such as domain-adaptive fine-tuning or multimodal integration. Evaluations on 24 LLMs demonstrate a consistent performance degradation with increasing task complexity, highlighting the current gap between language fluency and scientific computation accuracy. Code for QCBench is available at https://github.com/jiaqingxie/QCBench.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QCBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain-Specific Quantitative Chemistry

Ben Gao, Tianfan Fu, Jiaqing Xie, Yuqiang Li et al.
1 citations
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.52
article

QCBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain-Specific Quantitative Chemistry

Ben Gao, Tianfan Fu, Jiaqing Xie, Yuqiang Li, Hai Wan, Shufei Zhang, Weida Wang, Zhuo Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Quantitative chemistry is central to modern chemical research, yet the ability of large language models (LLMs) to perform its rigorous, step-by-step calculations remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we propose QCBench, a <b>Q</b>uantitative <b>C</b>hemistry oriented benchmark comprising 350 computational chemistry problems across 7 chemistry subfields, which contains analytical chemistry, bio-organic chemistry, general chemistry, inorganic chemistry, physical chemistry, polymer chemistry and quantum chemistry. To systematically evaluate the mathematical reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs), they are categorized into three tiers: easy, medium, and difficult. Each problem, rooted in realistic chemical scenarios, is structured to prevent heuristic shortcuts and demand explicit numerical reasoning. QCBench enables fine-grained diagnosis of computational weaknesses, reveals model-specific limitations across difficulty levels, and lays the groundwork for future improvements such as domain-adaptive fine-tuning or multimodal integration. Evaluations on 24 LLMs demonstrate a consistent performance degradation with increasing task complexity, highlighting the current gap between language fluency and scientific computation accuracy. Code for QCBench is available at https://github.com/jiaqingxie/QCBench.

Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingVol. 65(22)
Xidian University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN), Wuhan Business University (CN), China XD Group (China) (CN), Nanjing University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.