Face Lag Distance of Large-Section Excavation in Shallow-Buried Closely Spaced Tunnels Under Bias Loading

Shallow-buried, closely spaced tunnels under bias loading often encounter stability challenges due to excavation-induced interaction effects. These effects are particularly significant in the middle rock pillar zone. To evaluate the influence of face lag distance on tunnel stability, the Georgia No. 1 Tunnel was selected as a case study. Numerical simulations and field monitoring were combined to analyze the deformation and stress evolution under different face lag distances. The analysis focused on ground surface settlement, vault displacement, and tunnel clearance convergence. The results indicate that ground surface settlement decreases notably as the face lag distance increases. When the face lag distance increased from 0.5 D to 2.0 D, the maximum settlement decreased by about 11.9%, with the absolute maximum measured value of approximately 3.48 mm. Stress concentration occurred mainly within 15 m behind the excavation face, suggesting that a face lag distance exceeding this range can effectively mitigate tunnel interaction effects. The biased tunnel side experienced greater vault settlement and convergence, requiring closer monitoring. An insufficient face lag distance amplifies deformation superposition, whereas an excessive one causes additional horizontal fluctuations. For the geological and structural conditions of the Georgia No. 1 Tunnel, a face lag distance of approximately 2.0 D provides an optimal balance between stability, safety, and construction efficiency. These findings offer practical guidance for the design and safe construction of shallow-buried twin tunnels under bias loading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111633
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Face Lag Distance of Large-Section Excavation in Shallow-Buried Closely Spaced Tunnels Under Bias Loading

Feng Dai, Xiaoxu Tian, Zhilin Cao, Zhenyao Shen et al.
Applied Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Face Lag Distance of Large-Section Excavation in Shallow-Buried Closely Spaced Tunnels Under Bias Loading

Feng Dai, Xiaoxu Tian, Zhilin Cao, Zhenyao Shen, Jin Guo
article en

Abstract

Shallow-buried, closely spaced tunnels under bias loading often encounter stability challenges due to excavation-induced interaction effects. These effects are particularly significant in the middle rock pillar zone. To evaluate the influence of face lag distance on tunnel stability, the Georgia No. 1 Tunnel was selected as a case study. Numerical simulations and field monitoring were combined to analyze the deformation and stress evolution under different face lag distances. The analysis focused on ground surface settlement, vault displacement, and tunnel clearance convergence. The results indicate that ground surface settlement decreases notably as the face lag distance increases. When the face lag distance increased from 0.5 D to 2.0 D, the maximum settlement decreased by about 11.9%, with the absolute maximum measured value of approximately 3.48 mm. Stress concentration occurred mainly within 15 m behind the excavation face, suggesting that a face lag distance exceeding this range can effectively mitigate tunnel interaction effects. The biased tunnel side experienced greater vault settlement and convergence, requiring closer monitoring. An insufficient face lag distance amplifies deformation superposition, whereas an excessive one causes additional horizontal fluctuations. For the geological and structural conditions of the Georgia No. 1 Tunnel, a face lag distance of approximately 2.0 D provides an optimal balance between stability, safety, and construction efficiency. These findings offer practical guidance for the design and safe construction of shallow-buried twin tunnels under bias loading.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(21)
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology (CN), China Communications Construction Company (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.