Introduction

The articles that follow, initially presented in 1983 as the thirty-second series of Thomas M. Cooley Lectures, address a subject that has deep roots in the United States' history. Assurances that there would be constitutional protection of what are now called human rights-in the United States, they have more frequently been referred to as civil liberties and civil rights or individual rights and liberties-was a practical condition for the adoption of the Constitution. The belief that such guarantees are of vital importance in maintaining a society that is both free and just has over time become even more deeply embedded in our national consciousness. Despite the intense controversy that from time to time erupts over one or another Supreme Court decision-or perhaps because of it-it has become an article of faith among Americans that a constitutional specification of rights, enforced and elaborated by courts, is necessary to ensure liberty and as a safeguard against injustice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.18.1.introduction
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction

Terrance Sandalow
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Introduction

Terrance Sandalow
article en

Abstract

The articles that follow, initially presented in 1983 as the thirty-second series of Thomas M. Cooley Lectures, address a subject that has deep roots in the United States' history. Assurances that there would be constitutional protection of what are now called human rights-in the United States, they have more frequently been referred to as civil liberties and civil rights or individual rights and liberties-was a practical condition for the adoption of the Constitution. The belief that such guarantees are of vital importance in maintaining a society that is both free and just has over time become even more deeply embedded in our national consciousness. Despite the intense controversy that from time to time erupts over one or another Supreme Court decision-or perhaps because of it-it has become an article of faith among Americans that a constitutional specification of rights, enforced and elaborated by courts, is necessary to ensure liberty and as a safeguard against injustice.

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform(18.1)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Introduction — Terrance Sandalow · University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS