The Impact of a Structured Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Programme on Quality of Care, Optimisation of Antimicrobial Use, and Healthcare Costs: A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> In 2022, Spaarne Gasthuis hospital implemented an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programme, including mandatory infectious disease (ID) specialist assessment and integrated structured workflow, aiming to improve quality of care, optimize antimicrobial use, and reduce healthcare costs. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the OPAT programme on patient outcomes (IV duration, clinical response, adverse clinical outcomes, timely peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) removal), antimicrobial stewardship parameters, and healthcare costs. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective before-after cohort study used electronic health record data to compare patients treated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy before (2019) and after (August 2022-December 2024) OPAT programme implementation. Using linear and logistic regression analyses, the association between the independent variable (pre-OPAT vs. OPAT) and outcomes were assessed and adjusted for potential confounders (sex, age, department, primary and additional indications). Cost analysis was performed, and ID specialist-recommended therapy adjustments were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> In total, 529 patients were included: 118 in the pre-OPAT group, and 411 in the OPAT group. In 36.3% of OPAT cases, therapy was adjusted, thereby optimizing antimicrobial stewardship. The OPAT programme was associated with significantly shorter IV therapy duration of 13.97 (mean) days (95%CI -9.15--18.79; <i>p</i> < 0.001), significantly less meropenem use (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and significantly less adverse clinical outcomes (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.37-0.92; <i>p</i> = 0.021), whereas no significant difference was found in clinical response (OR 1.22; 95%CI 0.67-2.32; <i>p</i> = 0.527). The programme led to cost savings of 3.343 EUR per patient. <b>Conclusions:</b> The OPAT programme optimized antimicrobial use and reduced IV therapy duration, adverse clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14111103
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of a Structured Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Programme on Quality of Care, Optimisation of Antimicrobial Use, and Healthcare Costs: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Irene Manders, Dennis Souverein, Bjorn L. Herpers, Steven F. L. van Lelyveld et al.
Antibiotics
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

The Impact of a Structured Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Programme on Quality of Care, Optimisation of Antimicrobial Use, and Healthcare Costs: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Irene Manders, Dennis Souverein, Bjorn L. Herpers, Steven F. L. van Lelyveld, Sjoerd M. Euser, Marco Goeijenbier, Jayant Kalpoe, Darya Comello, Judith Vetten
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> In 2022, Spaarne Gasthuis hospital implemented an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programme, including mandatory infectious disease (ID) specialist assessment and integrated structured workflow, aiming to improve quality of care, optimize antimicrobial use, and reduce healthcare costs. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the OPAT programme on patient outcomes (IV duration, clinical response, adverse clinical outcomes, timely peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) removal), antimicrobial stewardship parameters, and healthcare costs. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective before-after cohort study used electronic health record data to compare patients treated with outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy before (2019) and after (August 2022-December 2024) OPAT programme implementation. Using linear and logistic regression analyses, the association between the independent variable (pre-OPAT vs. OPAT) and outcomes were assessed and adjusted for potential confounders (sex, age, department, primary and additional indications). Cost analysis was performed, and ID specialist-recommended therapy adjustments were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> In total, 529 patients were included: 118 in the pre-OPAT group, and 411 in the OPAT group. In 36.3% of OPAT cases, therapy was adjusted, thereby optimizing antimicrobial stewardship. The OPAT programme was associated with significantly shorter IV therapy duration of 13.97 (mean) days (95%CI -9.15--18.79; <i>p</i> < 0.001), significantly less meropenem use (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and significantly less adverse clinical outcomes (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.37-0.92; <i>p</i> = 0.021), whereas no significant difference was found in clinical response (OR 1.22; 95%CI 0.67-2.32; <i>p</i> = 0.527). The programme led to cost savings of 3.343 EUR per patient. <b>Conclusions:</b> The OPAT programme optimized antimicrobial use and reduced IV therapy duration, adverse clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs.

AntibioticsVol. 14(11)
Spaarne Gasthuis (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.