Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies: Mathematical Beliefs Perspective

This study investigated the relationship between preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and their mathematical modeling competencies. In the study, the belief categories of the preservice teachers were first determined using Q methodology and then classified into traditional and non-traditional belief. A Mathematical Modeling Competencies Rubric was developed in line with the literature and expert opinions. Three independent experts used this rubric to evaluate holistic modeling tasks that the participants completed. The resulting scores were analyzed using the Many-Facet Rasch Model to test for differences in modeling competencies among the belief groups. The findings revealed that preservice mathematics teachers with non-traditional beliefs demonstrated higher modeling competencies than those with traditional beliefs (χ2 = 84.7, df = 3, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the study highlights that preservice mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics play a crucial role in developing modeling competencies and suggests that belief structures should be considered in teacher education programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111463
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies: Mathematical Beliefs Perspective

Yüksel Dede, Gürcan Kaya
Education Sciences
Q Methodology Applications
article

Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies: Mathematical Beliefs Perspective

Yüksel Dede, Gürcan Kaya
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and their mathematical modeling competencies. In the study, the belief categories of the preservice teachers were first determined using Q methodology and then classified into traditional and non-traditional belief. A Mathematical Modeling Competencies Rubric was developed in line with the literature and expert opinions. Three independent experts used this rubric to evaluate holistic modeling tasks that the participants completed. The resulting scores were analyzed using the Many-Facet Rasch Model to test for differences in modeling competencies among the belief groups. The findings revealed that preservice mathematics teachers with non-traditional beliefs demonstrated higher modeling competencies than those with traditional beliefs (χ2 = 84.7, df = 3, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the study highlights that preservice mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics play a crucial role in developing modeling competencies and suggests that belief structures should be considered in teacher education programs.

Education SciencesVol. 15(11)
Afyon Kocatepe University (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Gazi Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Q Methodology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies: Mathematical Beliefs Perspective — Yüksel Dede, Gürcan Kaya · Education Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS