Accuracy of Death Certificates for Children: A Population-Based Retrospective Analysis

<b>Background/Objective</b>: Accurate determination and documentation of causes of death in children are essential for generating reliable mortality statistics and guiding public health strategies. Previous studies have reported frequent inaccuracies in pediatric death certificates (DCs), including the use of vague terms, omissions of relevant conditions, and variability across physician specialties. This study evaluated the accuracy of pediatric DCs in Shiga Prefecture, Japan; identified common errors in these DCs; and examined changes in the underlying causes of pediatric death before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a population-based retrospective review of 391 DCs for individuals under 18 years issued between 2015 and 2023. Two pediatricians and two forensic pathologists independently reviewed each DC, assessed accuracy, and classified errors using predefined criteria. Error rates were compared by physician specialty. Underlying causes of death were reassessed into ten categories, and their distributions were compared between 2015-2019 and 2020-2023. <b>Results</b>: Overall, 30.9% of DCs contained errors. The error rates differed by physician specialty: obstetricians had the highest error rate (92.9%), whereas forensic physicians had the lowest (8.4%). The most common error type was the use of non-specific mechanisms such as "cardiac arrest" or "respiratory failure", rather than the actual causes of death. Congenital anomalies were often listed under other significant conditions contributing to death and not as an underlying cause of death. After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, deaths from acute diseases declined from 16.8% to 4.0%, while deaths from congenital disorders increased from 12.6% to 24.3%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Pediatric DCs often contain errors, particularly those completed by obstetricians. Misclassifying mechanisms as causes of death and underreporting congenital anomalies remain the main challenges. Strengthening physician education and introducing systematic review processes are essential to improve accuracy, clarify regional mortality trends, and guide effective public health interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Reports
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric17060115
Primary Topic
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Death Certificates for Children: A Population-Based Retrospective Analysis

Kohei Takashima, Seiro Narumiya, Yoshihiro Maruo, Masahito Hitosugi et al.
Pediatric Reports
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
article

Accuracy of Death Certificates for Children: A Population-Based Retrospective Analysis

Kohei Takashima, Seiro Narumiya, Yoshihiro Maruo, Masahito Hitosugi, Eisuke Ito, Mami Nakamura, M Yamamoto
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objective</b>: Accurate determination and documentation of causes of death in children are essential for generating reliable mortality statistics and guiding public health strategies. Previous studies have reported frequent inaccuracies in pediatric death certificates (DCs), including the use of vague terms, omissions of relevant conditions, and variability across physician specialties. This study evaluated the accuracy of pediatric DCs in Shiga Prefecture, Japan; identified common errors in these DCs; and examined changes in the underlying causes of pediatric death before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a population-based retrospective review of 391 DCs for individuals under 18 years issued between 2015 and 2023. Two pediatricians and two forensic pathologists independently reviewed each DC, assessed accuracy, and classified errors using predefined criteria. Error rates were compared by physician specialty. Underlying causes of death were reassessed into ten categories, and their distributions were compared between 2015-2019 and 2020-2023. <b>Results</b>: Overall, 30.9% of DCs contained errors. The error rates differed by physician specialty: obstetricians had the highest error rate (92.9%), whereas forensic physicians had the lowest (8.4%). The most common error type was the use of non-specific mechanisms such as "cardiac arrest" or "respiratory failure", rather than the actual causes of death. Congenital anomalies were often listed under other significant conditions contributing to death and not as an underlying cause of death. After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, deaths from acute diseases declined from 16.8% to 4.0%, while deaths from congenital disorders increased from 12.6% to 24.3%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Pediatric DCs often contain errors, particularly those completed by obstetricians. Misclassifying mechanisms as causes of death and underreporting congenital anomalies remain the main challenges. Strengthening physician education and introducing systematic review processes are essential to improve accuracy, clarify regional mortality trends, and guide effective public health interventions.

Pediatric ReportsVol. 17(6)
Shiga University of Medical Science (JP), Shiga University (JP), Nagahama City Hospital (JP), Saiseikai Shigaken Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.