Do Cancer Patients Present a Different Phenotype of Atrial Fibrillation or a Different Arrhythmia Management?

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Along with cardiovascular disease, cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with active cancer (study group) and those without cancer (control group). <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with both AF and active cancer referred for consultation to the Cardiac Arrhythmias Outpatient Clinic at our institution in 2022. They were matched in a 1:1 ratio, by age and sex to patients with AF without cancer. The matching criteria for the study and control groups were limited to age and gender. Variables such as comorbidities, atrial fibrillation duration, tumor stage, and treatment were not included in the matching criteria. <b>Results</b>: We examined 216 patients, 57.4% of whom were men. There were 110 patients in the study group with a mean age of 70 (10) years. Several parameters in the study group attracted our particular attention: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was lower (703 pg/mL vs. 1549 pg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.01), echocardiography revealed smaller left atrial size (43 (6) mm vs. 47 (7) mm, <i>p</i> = 0.015), left ventricular (LV) diastolic dimension (49 mm vs. 52 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and better LV systolic function expressed as LV ejection fraction (54% (9%) vs. 51% (12%), <i>p</i> = 0.025), and global longitudinal strain (-16% (4%) vs. -13% (3%), <i>p</i> = 0.016). Antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy was used less frequently in the study group, which may also have been due to physicians' reluctance to treat AF aggressively in a more morbid population. <b>Conclusions</b>: Patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation may have a different clinical profile, suggesting a different pathophysiology. Understanding these differences may help reduce the incidence of AF and improve patient outcomes and prognosis during cancer treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112700
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Cancer Patients Present a Different Phenotype of Atrial Fibrillation or a Different Arrhythmia Management?

Ludmiła Daniłowicz‐Szymanowicz, Ewa Lewicka, Aleksandra Liżewska-Springer, Mikołaj Młyński et al.
Biomedicines
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Do Cancer Patients Present a Different Phenotype of Atrial Fibrillation or a Different Arrhythmia Management?

Ludmiła Daniłowicz‐Szymanowicz, Ewa Lewicka, Aleksandra Liżewska-Springer, Mikołaj Młyński, Maja Hawryszko, Grzegorz Sławiński, Katarzyna Wiśniewska, Patryk Macuk, Weronika Pusz-Bulas
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Along with cardiovascular disease, cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with active cancer (study group) and those without cancer (control group). <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with both AF and active cancer referred for consultation to the Cardiac Arrhythmias Outpatient Clinic at our institution in 2022. They were matched in a 1:1 ratio, by age and sex to patients with AF without cancer. The matching criteria for the study and control groups were limited to age and gender. Variables such as comorbidities, atrial fibrillation duration, tumor stage, and treatment were not included in the matching criteria. <b>Results</b>: We examined 216 patients, 57.4% of whom were men. There were 110 patients in the study group with a mean age of 70 (10) years. Several parameters in the study group attracted our particular attention: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was lower (703 pg/mL vs. 1549 pg/mL, <i>p</i> = 0.01), echocardiography revealed smaller left atrial size (43 (6) mm vs. 47 (7) mm, <i>p</i> = 0.015), left ventricular (LV) diastolic dimension (49 mm vs. 52 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and better LV systolic function expressed as LV ejection fraction (54% (9%) vs. 51% (12%), <i>p</i> = 0.025), and global longitudinal strain (-16% (4%) vs. -13% (3%), <i>p</i> = 0.016). Antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy was used less frequently in the study group, which may also have been due to physicians' reluctance to treat AF aggressively in a more morbid population. <b>Conclusions</b>: Patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation may have a different clinical profile, suggesting a different pathophysiology. Understanding these differences may help reduce the incidence of AF and improve patient outcomes and prognosis during cancer treatment.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(11)
Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.