MEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS OLYMPIC GAMES NORMATIVE VALUES

The aim of this study is to establish normative values for the men's artistic gymnastics discipline in the Olympic Games. To this end, data from athletes who competed in the Tokyo 2020 and Paris 2024 Olympic Games were analysed. The athletes’ scores were converted into z-scores, and normative values were established by defining qualitative descriptions for T-score performance ranges, from extremely weak to excellent (<20: extremely weak, ≥20–≤30: very weak, >30–≤40: weak, >40–≤45: below average, >45–≤55: average, >55–≤60: above average, >60–≤70: good, >70–≤80: very good, >80: excellent). In addition, the performances of athletes in both the qualification and final rounds of Tokyo 2020 and Paris 2024 were compared. When comparing the scores obtained by athletes across the six apparatus in the Olympics, a statistically significant difference was found only in the execution score of the first vault in the vault apparatus final (p<0.05). The findings of this study are expected to serve as a guide for coaches and athletes in setting performance goals. Furthermore, the normative data obtained can be considered an important reference dataset for determining the performance levels of athletes representing their countries in international competitions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science of Gymnastics Journal
Published
2025-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.17.3.461-473
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Gymnastics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS OLYMPIC GAMES NORMATIVE VALUES

Özlem Keskin
Science of Gymnastics Journal
Physical Education and Gymnastics
article

MEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS OLYMPIC GAMES NORMATIVE VALUES

Özlem Keskin
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to establish normative values for the men's artistic gymnastics discipline in the Olympic Games. To this end, data from athletes who competed in the Tokyo 2020 and Paris 2024 Olympic Games were analysed. The athletes’ scores were converted into z-scores, and normative values were established by defining qualitative descriptions for T-score performance ranges, from extremely weak to excellent (<20: extremely weak, ≥20–≤30: very weak, >30–≤40: weak, >40–≤45: below average, >45–≤55: average, >55–≤60: above average, >60–≤70: good, >70–≤80: very good, >80: excellent). In addition, the performances of athletes in both the qualification and final rounds of Tokyo 2020 and Paris 2024 were compared. When comparing the scores obtained by athletes across the six apparatus in the Olympics, a statistically significant difference was found only in the execution score of the first vault in the vault apparatus final (p<0.05). The findings of this study are expected to serve as a guide for coaches and athletes in setting performance goals. Furthermore, the normative data obtained can be considered an important reference dataset for determining the performance levels of athletes representing their countries in international competitions.

Science of Gymnastics JournalVol. 17(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Physical Education and Gymnastics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.