Monitoring medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada: Perspectives of physicians, nurse practitioners, and organizational regulatory actors

Canada's federal monitoring system for medical assistance in dying (MAiD) commenced in 2018 and was expanded in 2023 to enhance data collection. This article sought to understand the role of monitoring in the regulation of MAiD in Canada. It reports on qualitative interviews conducted with 68 participants from two key groups: MAiD assessors and providers; and "organizational actors" from a range of bodies including government, regulators, professional organizations, and healthcare organizations. Participants' views of the monitoring framework for MAiD were analyzed. There was consensus that monitoring should be distinguished from oversight. Participants thought the monitoring system provided important transparency into MAiD practice but emphasized mitigating burdens on practitioners, where possible. Methods of data collection varied, and a pan-Canadian approach was challenging. Participants had different views about the appropriate scope of data. The article concludes with recommendations for effective monitoring of assisted dying practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Death Studies
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2572743
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada: Perspectives of physicians, nurse practitioners, and organizational regulatory actors

Eliana Close, Ben P. White, Jocelyn Downie
1 citations
Death Studies
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.88
article

Monitoring medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada: Perspectives of physicians, nurse practitioners, and organizational regulatory actors

Eliana Close, Ben P. White, Jocelyn Downie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Canada's federal monitoring system for medical assistance in dying (MAiD) commenced in 2018 and was expanded in 2023 to enhance data collection. This article sought to understand the role of monitoring in the regulation of MAiD in Canada. It reports on qualitative interviews conducted with 68 participants from two key groups: MAiD assessors and providers; and "organizational actors" from a range of bodies including government, regulators, professional organizations, and healthcare organizations. Participants' views of the monitoring framework for MAiD were analyzed. There was consensus that monitoring should be distinguished from oversight. Participants thought the monitoring system provided important transparency into MAiD practice but emphasized mitigating burdens on practitioners, where possible. Methods of data collection varied, and a pan-Canadian approach was challenging. Participants had different views about the appropriate scope of data. The article concludes with recommendations for effective monitoring of assisted dying practices.

Death Studies
Dalhousie University (CA), Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.