LABDT (Lexi AdaBoost Decision Tree): An Approach for Legal Outcome Prediction Fusing Lexical, Semantic, and Similarity-based features
Legal outcome prediction is a complex task due to the nuanced vocabulary and reasoning embedded in judicial documents. This study proposes LABDT (Lexi AdaBoost Decision Tree), a novel hybrid framework that integrates lexical features (TF-IDF), semantic embeddings (Sentence-BERT), and similarity-based metrics for robust and interpretable legal decision classification. The model addresses class imbalance through SMOTE and reduces feature dimensionality via principal component analysis (PCA). LABDT was evaluated on a real-world dataset of approximately 18,000 cases from the Federal Court of Australia case records, spanning eight outcome classes. The results demonstrate that LABDT outperforms traditional and state-of-the-art classifiers with an accuracy of 92%, precision of 91%, recall of 91%, and F1-score of 91%. Notably, it achieved highly accurate classification on certain outcome classes like ‘approved’ and ‘related’. LABDT offers a superior balance between predictive performance and model interpretability compared to baseline models. The system’s explainable design and high classification reliability position it as a viable tool for AI-driven legal analytics and judicial decision support.
Authors
- Zulfiqar Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1599-1287)
- Avinash Samantra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9913-3003)
- Biswajit Swain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-5319)
- Santanu Kumar Sahoo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8324-3101)
- Ghulam Muhammad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8635-6010)
- Chinmaya Kumar Mohapatra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6243-3974)
Institutions
- University of Essex (GB)
- Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN)
- King Saud University (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-025-01003-2
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- King Saud University