Pharmacogenomic Drug–Target Network Analysis Reveals Similarity Profiles Among FDA–Approved Cancer Drugs

<b>Background</b>: Defining specific molecular targets for cancer therapeutics remains a significant challenge in oncology. Many Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anticancer drugs have incomplete target profiles, which limits our understanding of their mechanisms of action and opportunities for drug application. In this context, this study aimed to establish novel, biologically meaningful relationships between anticancer drugs and protein-coding genes. <b>Methods</b>: We developed a pharmacogenomic method that integrates transcriptomic data with drug activity data from the NCI-60 cancer cell line panel to study the interactions between 124 FDA-approved anticancer drugs and 399 cancer-related genes. Through this analysis, we identified gene-drug relationships and created a bipartite interaction network. To evaluate drug similarity, we developed a new index called the B-index. This novel similarity coefficient measures the association between two drugs based on their shared gene targets in the network. The index calculates the intersection of two sets of drug targets while considering the relative proportion of targets exhibited by each drug. For an independent assessment, we compared this network-based similarity with the chemical structural similarity of the drugs, computed based on two structural coefficients: Maximum Common Substructure and Tanimoto. <b>Results</b>: The study identified 1304 statistically significant drug-gene relationships, providing a large-scale network of pharmacogenomic interactions. Clustering analysis of the network, based on the B-index, grouped drugs with common targets together. This grouping was consistent with well-established drug classes and structural characteristics. Well-established drug pairs, such as cytarabine-gemcitabine or afatinib-neratinib, exhibited high B-index and structural similarity values, validating the methodology. Several novel gene associations were discovered, yielding testable hypotheses for mechanism-based repurposing. <b>Conclusions</b>: This work presents a comprehensive, network-based strategy for elucidating cancer drug targets by combining gene expression and drug activity profiles. Additionally, the B-index provides an alternative to conventional chemical similarity metrics, which can facilitate the identification of new therapeutic relationships and inform new drug applications and repositioning. These findings pave the way for the proposal of novel oncology drug targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17111421
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacogenomic Drug–Target Network Analysis Reveals Similarity Profiles Among FDA–Approved Cancer Drugs

José Manuel Sánchez-Santos, Alberto Berral-González, Diego Alonso‐López, M. Arroyo et al.
Pharmaceutics
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Pharmacogenomic Drug–Target Network Analysis Reveals Similarity Profiles Among FDA–Approved Cancer Drugs

José Manuel Sánchez-Santos, Alberto Berral-González, Diego Alonso‐López, M. Arroyo, Javier De Las Rivas, María Jesús Rivas López
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Defining specific molecular targets for cancer therapeutics remains a significant challenge in oncology. Many Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anticancer drugs have incomplete target profiles, which limits our understanding of their mechanisms of action and opportunities for drug application. In this context, this study aimed to establish novel, biologically meaningful relationships between anticancer drugs and protein-coding genes. <b>Methods</b>: We developed a pharmacogenomic method that integrates transcriptomic data with drug activity data from the NCI-60 cancer cell line panel to study the interactions between 124 FDA-approved anticancer drugs and 399 cancer-related genes. Through this analysis, we identified gene-drug relationships and created a bipartite interaction network. To evaluate drug similarity, we developed a new index called the B-index. This novel similarity coefficient measures the association between two drugs based on their shared gene targets in the network. The index calculates the intersection of two sets of drug targets while considering the relative proportion of targets exhibited by each drug. For an independent assessment, we compared this network-based similarity with the chemical structural similarity of the drugs, computed based on two structural coefficients: Maximum Common Substructure and Tanimoto. <b>Results</b>: The study identified 1304 statistically significant drug-gene relationships, providing a large-scale network of pharmacogenomic interactions. Clustering analysis of the network, based on the B-index, grouped drugs with common targets together. This grouping was consistent with well-established drug classes and structural characteristics. Well-established drug pairs, such as cytarabine-gemcitabine or afatinib-neratinib, exhibited high B-index and structural similarity values, validating the methodology. Several novel gene associations were discovered, yielding testable hypotheses for mechanism-based repurposing. <b>Conclusions</b>: This work presents a comprehensive, network-based strategy for elucidating cancer drug targets by combining gene expression and drug activity profiles. Additionally, the B-index provides an alternative to conventional chemical similarity metrics, which can facilitate the identification of new therapeutic relationships and inform new drug applications and repositioning. These findings pave the way for the proposal of novel oncology drug targets.

PharmaceuticsVol. 17(11)
Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico (PR), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Instituto de Física Fundamental (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (ES), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.