Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Phase 2 randomized trial (REVO)

Several studies have evaluated PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but comparative data with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remain limited. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 non-inferiority trial (REVO, NCT05007145) assessed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (ICT) versus CRT in patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC. A total of 104 patients were randomized to ICT (camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin) or CRT (nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, radiotherapy). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). ICT achieved a pCR rate of 32.7% versus 34.6% with CRT (rate ratio 0.94, 90% CI 0.6-1.49), demonstrating non-inferiority and meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. Major pathologic response was observed in 42.3% of ICT patients and 57.7% of CRT patients, with R0 resection achieved in 100% of both groups. 1-year disease-free survival was 89.1% versus 78.2%, and 1-year overall survival was 100% versus 92.3% for ICT and CRT, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19.2% of ICT patients and 33.3% of CRT patients, and surgical complications were reported in 31.1% and 35.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that ICT is a safe and effective neoadjuvant strategy for resectable ESCC with a more favorable safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64660-z
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Phase 2 randomized trial (REVO)

Qingfeng Zheng, Derong Zhang, Feng Wang, Juhui Chen et al.
3 citations
Nature Communications
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
6.02
article

Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Phase 2 randomized trial (REVO)

Qingfeng Zheng, Derong Zhang, Feng Wang, Juhui Chen, Peng Chen, Changhong Lian, Shujun Liang, Mengxia Lei, Mingqiu Chen, Canhua Huang, Ni Guan, Xiaofeng Chen, Yujie Chen, Weijie Chen, Junhua Liu, Jiancheng Li, Junqiang Chen, Hao He, Shuoyan Liu, Peiyuan Wang, Hui Lin, Yu Lin, Wenshan Zhang, Buhong Zheng, Feng-Nian Zhuang, Rongfang Huang, Yuanji Xu, Huaxin Cai, Jin Yan, Jun-Peng Lin, Wenwei Wei, Jiezhong Wang, Hang Zhou
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Several studies have evaluated PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but comparative data with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remain limited. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 non-inferiority trial (REVO, NCT05007145) assessed the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (ICT) versus CRT in patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC. A total of 104 patients were randomized to ICT (camrelizumab, nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin) or CRT (nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, radiotherapy). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR). ICT achieved a pCR rate of 32.7% versus 34.6% with CRT (rate ratio 0.94, 90% CI 0.6-1.49), demonstrating non-inferiority and meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. Major pathologic response was observed in 42.3% of ICT patients and 57.7% of CRT patients, with R0 resection achieved in 100% of both groups. 1-year disease-free survival was 89.1% versus 78.2%, and 1-year overall survival was 100% versus 92.3% for ICT and CRT, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19.2% of ICT patients and 33.3% of CRT patients, and surgical complications were reported in 31.1% and 35.9%, respectively. These findings indicate that ICT is a safe and effective neoadjuvant strategy for resectable ESCC with a more favorable safety profile.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Changzhi Medical College (CN), Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province (CN), Zhuhai People's Hospital (CN), The 180th Hospital of PLA (CN), Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine (China) (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
6.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.