Machine Learning-Based Heart Disease Prediction: A Comparative Evaluation of Classification Methods

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of global mortality, with late diagnosis presenting a critical challenge in healthcare systems worldwide. This study presents a comparative evaluation of three machine learning classifiers for heart disease prediction using the UCI Heart Disease dataset. The research implemented and evaluated logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest algorithms to assess their predictive capabilities for cardiovascular conditions. Methodology involved comprehensive data preprocessing, feature selection, and model training using a 70-30 train-test split. Performance was assessed through accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrix analysis. Results demonstrated that random forest achieved superior performance with accuracy of 88-92% and the highest recall value, followed by support vector machine (84-88% accuracy) and logistic regression (82-85% accuracy). The findings indicate that machine learning models, particularly ensemble methods like random forest, can effectively support clinical decision-making for heart disease prediction. The study concludes that integrating such models into healthcare systems could significantly enhance early detection capabilities and improve patient outcomes in cardiovascular care

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-29634
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Heart Disease Prediction: A Comparative Evaluation of Classification Methods

Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Prem Kumar Chandrakar, Simaran Chandrakar
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Machine Learning-Based Heart Disease Prediction: A Comparative Evaluation of Classification Methods

Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Prem Kumar Chandrakar, Simaran Chandrakar
article en

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of global mortality, with late diagnosis presenting a critical challenge in healthcare systems worldwide. This study presents a comparative evaluation of three machine learning classifiers for heart disease prediction using the UCI Heart Disease dataset. The research implemented and evaluated logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest algorithms to assess their predictive capabilities for cardiovascular conditions. Methodology involved comprehensive data preprocessing, feature selection, and model training using a 70-30 train-test split. Performance was assessed through accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrix analysis. Results demonstrated that random forest achieved superior performance with accuracy of 88-92% and the highest recall value, followed by support vector machine (84-88% accuracy) and logistic regression (82-85% accuracy). The findings indicate that machine learning models, particularly ensemble methods like random forest, can effectively support clinical decision-making for heart disease prediction. The study concludes that integrating such models into healthcare systems could significantly enhance early detection capabilities and improve patient outcomes in cardiovascular care

International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Mahaveer Academy of Technology and Science University (IN), Pandit Sundarlal Sharma Open University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.