Representational dynamics of the main dimensions of object space: Face/body selectivity aligns temporally with animal taxonomy but not with animacy

Object representations are organized according to multiple dimensions, with an important role for the distinction between animate and inanimate objects and for selectivity for faces versus bodies. For other dimensions, questions remain how they stand relative to these two primary dimensions. One such dimension is a graded selectivity for the taxonomic level that an animal belongs to. Earlier research suggested that animacy can be understood as a graded selectivity for animal taxonomy, although a recent functional magnetic resonance imaging study suggested that taxonomic effects are instead due to face/body selectivity. Here we investigated the temporal profile at which these distinctions emerge with multivariate electroencephalography (N = 25), using a stimulus set that dissociates taxonomy from face/body selectivity and from animacy as a binary distinction. Our findings reveal a very similar temporal profile for taxonomy and face/body selectivity with a peak around 150 ms. The binary animacy distinction has a more continuous and delayed temporal profile. These findings strengthen the conclusion that effects of animal taxonomy are in large part due to face/body selectivity, whereas selectivity for animate versus inanimate objects is delayed when it is dissociated from these other dimensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.13.2
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representational dynamics of the main dimensions of object space: Face/body selectivity aligns temporally with animal taxonomy but not with animacy

Chiu‐Yueh Chen, Hans Op de Beeck, Gaëlle Leys, Andreas von Leupoldt et al.
Journal of Vision
Face Recognition and Perception
article

Representational dynamics of the main dimensions of object space: Face/body selectivity aligns temporally with animal taxonomy but not with animacy

Chiu‐Yueh Chen, Hans Op de Beeck, Gaëlle Leys, Andreas von Leupoldt, J. Brendan Ritchie
article en

Abstract

Object representations are organized according to multiple dimensions, with an important role for the distinction between animate and inanimate objects and for selectivity for faces versus bodies. For other dimensions, questions remain how they stand relative to these two primary dimensions. One such dimension is a graded selectivity for the taxonomic level that an animal belongs to. Earlier research suggested that animacy can be understood as a graded selectivity for animal taxonomy, although a recent functional magnetic resonance imaging study suggested that taxonomic effects are instead due to face/body selectivity. Here we investigated the temporal profile at which these distinctions emerge with multivariate electroencephalography (N = 25), using a stimulus set that dissociates taxonomy from face/body selectivity and from animacy as a binary distinction. Our findings reveal a very similar temporal profile for taxonomy and face/body selectivity with a peak around 150 ms. The binary animacy distinction has a more continuous and delayed temporal profile. These findings strengthen the conclusion that effects of animal taxonomy are in large part due to face/body selectivity, whereas selectivity for animate versus inanimate objects is delayed when it is dissociated from these other dimensions.

Journal of VisionVol. 25(13)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), University of Lethbridge (CA), Twitter (United States) (US), Shih Chien University (TW), Inserm (FR), Genesys (United States) (US), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR), Knowledge Unlatched (Germany) (DE), St. Brendan's Hospital (GB), ORCID (US), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, KU Leuven, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.