How visual is the “groupitizing”? The impact of visual deprivation over its emergence

Previous research showed that people enumerate objects faster and more accurately when they form clusters, a phenomenon called "groupitizing". While mainly studied visually, its dependence on vision is unclear. Congenitally blind (CB) individuals provide a critical test: if vision is essential, CB people should lack groupitizing; if not, they may apply it across modalities, potentially outperforming sighted participants. We compared CB and sighted adults on an auditory groupitizing task, based on the estimation of 5-12 pure tones presented either randomly or grouped by temporal proximity. Both groups showed lower errors and higher precision for grouped sequences, confirming that groupitizing can emerge without visual experience. Importantly, for larger numerosities, sighted individuals' grouping benefit decreased, whereas CB participants maintained robust advantages across all set sizes. These findings suggest that groupitizing relies on amodal perceptual mechanisms and that congenital blindness may enhance auditory enumeration strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2025.2576743
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How visual is the “groupitizing”? The impact of visual deprivation over its emergence

Lorenzo Ciccione, Minye Zhan, Andrea Adriano
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

How visual is the “groupitizing”? The impact of visual deprivation over its emergence

Lorenzo Ciccione, Minye Zhan, Andrea Adriano
article en

Abstract

Previous research showed that people enumerate objects faster and more accurately when they form clusters, a phenomenon called "groupitizing". While mainly studied visually, its dependence on vision is unclear. Congenitally blind (CB) individuals provide a critical test: if vision is essential, CB people should lack groupitizing; if not, they may apply it across modalities, potentially outperforming sighted participants. We compared CB and sighted adults on an auditory groupitizing task, based on the estimation of 5-12 pure tones presented either randomly or grouped by temporal proximity. Both groups showed lower errors and higher precision for grouped sequences, confirming that groupitizing can emerge without visual experience. Importantly, for larger numerosities, sighted individuals' grouping benefit decreased, whereas CB participants maintained robust advantages across all set sizes. These findings suggest that groupitizing relies on amodal perceptual mechanisms and that congenital blindness may enhance auditory enumeration strategies.

Cognitive NeuropsychologyVol. 42(7-8)
Collège de France (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Université Paris 8 (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.