The US strategy of multidomain containment and China’s counter-responses in the Indo-Pacific (2019–2025)

Type of the article: Research articleThe intensifying United States-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific has gained acute relevance for global order as strategic competition extends across military, technological, economic, and cognitive domains. This paper examines the extent and modalities of the US multidimensional strategic encirclement of China in the Indo-Pacific and analyzes China’s multidomain responses, including the PLA’s intelligentization, technological sovereignty initiatives, and economic re-sovereignization, over the period 2019–2025. The study adopts a qualitative interpretivist methodology, drawing on scholarly and primary sources, including defense doctrines, alliance frameworks such as AUKUS and QUAD, legislative instruments, and multilingual Chinese perspectives. The analysis shows that the US employs layered alliance-building, technology governance through semiconductor and export-control regimes, triangulated partnerships with actors such as Israel and India, and selective interventions in regional states, including Pakistan and the Philippines, to constrain Chinese influence. China’s countermeasures are multidimensional: advancing AI-enabled military modernization, securing strategic port access at Gwadar, Hambantota, and Ream, and reinforcing economic insulation through its Dual Circulation Strategy and yuan-based energy agreements. Results indicate that encirclement is no longer limited to geography but increasingly embedded in digital infrastructure, economic flows, and cognitive influence. The study concludes that these dynamics are accelerating a shift toward bifurcated multipolarity, marked by competing techno-security ecosystems and divergent governance norms, with significant implications for alliance cohesion, technological sovereignty, and the management of strategic escalation.Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my teachers and academic peers whose valuable insights, encouragement, and constructive discussions inspire me to enrich the quality of my work. I am especially indebted to my family – my wife and children – for their patience, understanding, and unwavering support during the long hours of research and writing. Their endurance and encouragement made this endeavor possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geopolitics under Globalization
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21511/gg.06(1).2025.05
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Canadian Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The US strategy of multidomain containment and China’s counter-responses in the Indo-Pacific (2019–2025)

Saeed Ahmed
3 citations
Geopolitics under Globalization
Canadian Policy and Governance
25.57
article

The US strategy of multidomain containment and China’s counter-responses in the Indo-Pacific (2019–2025)

Saeed Ahmed
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Type of the article: Research articleThe intensifying United States-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific has gained acute relevance for global order as strategic competition extends across military, technological, economic, and cognitive domains. This paper examines the extent and modalities of the US multidimensional strategic encirclement of China in the Indo-Pacific and analyzes China’s multidomain responses, including the PLA’s intelligentization, technological sovereignty initiatives, and economic re-sovereignization, over the period 2019–2025. The study adopts a qualitative interpretivist methodology, drawing on scholarly and primary sources, including defense doctrines, alliance frameworks such as AUKUS and QUAD, legislative instruments, and multilingual Chinese perspectives. The analysis shows that the US employs layered alliance-building, technology governance through semiconductor and export-control regimes, triangulated partnerships with actors such as Israel and India, and selective interventions in regional states, including Pakistan and the Philippines, to constrain Chinese influence. China’s countermeasures are multidimensional: advancing AI-enabled military modernization, securing strategic port access at Gwadar, Hambantota, and Ream, and reinforcing economic insulation through its Dual Circulation Strategy and yuan-based energy agreements. Results indicate that encirclement is no longer limited to geography but increasingly embedded in digital infrastructure, economic flows, and cognitive influence. The study concludes that these dynamics are accelerating a shift toward bifurcated multipolarity, marked by competing techno-security ecosystems and divergent governance norms, with significant implications for alliance cohesion, technological sovereignty, and the management of strategic escalation.Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my teachers and academic peers whose valuable insights, encouragement, and constructive discussions inspire me to enrich the quality of my work. I am especially indebted to my family – my wife and children – for their patience, understanding, and unwavering support during the long hours of research and writing. Their endurance and encouragement made this endeavor possible.

Geopolitics under GlobalizationVol. 6(1)
School of International Relations (IR), University of International Relations (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Canadian Policy and Governance
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.