Abstract 4368647: Improving Center Performance Assessment in Congenital Heart Surgery Through Causal Inference Weighting Approaches

Background: Traditional congenital heart surgery quality assessments rely on indirect standardization via regression, which can be complicated by heterogeneity in case-mix, surgical volume, and low mortality rates. Our prior work revealed causal inference methods can better balance such differences across centers, yet these methods have not been widely studied to date. Aim: To compare quality assessments using traditional regression vs. causal inference weighting approaches. Methods: Using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (2016-22) for 10 Benchmark Operations (BMO), center observed:expected (O:E) operative mortality was calculated. Regression pooled all patients, adjusting for 21 covariates and 38 procedure-age random effects to estimate expected mortality. The causal approach divided observed mortality at each center by a weighted average of observed mortality at other centers using two weighting approaches (stable balancing [SBW] and covariate balancing propensity scores [CBPS]) and up to 204 covariates for balancing. O:E ratios (95% bootstrap intervals) were compared across methods. Results: Across 42,579 BMOs from 115 US centers (median age 462 days, 43% female), overall operative mortality was 2.37% (range: 0.38%-6.8% in centers with ≥100 operations). Regression yielded lower, less variable O:E ratios (mean=1.37 [SD=1.21]) than causal methods (SBW = 1.76 [2.30]; CBPS = 1.79 [2.47]; Panel A ). Lower volume centers had greater variability across estimates ( Panel B ). Regression classified fewer centers as having higher-than-expected mortality (9/115; 7.8%) compared to SBW (19/115; 17%) and CBPS (18/115; 15%); and more centers as lower-than-expected ( Panel C ). Compared to centers classified as higher-than-expected by all approaches, discordant centers had smaller volumes, treated more adults, and performed fewer higher complexity operations. Conclusions: Congenital heart surgery quality assessments are sensitive to the approach for case-mix adjustment. As causal inference approaches better account for such differences across centers and rely on fewer statistical assumptions, their adoption is encouraged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368647
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4368647: Improving Center Performance Assessment in Congenital Heart Surgery Through Causal Inference Weighting Approaches

Larry Han, John E. Mayer, Katya Zelevinsky, Sara K. Pasquali et al.
Circulation
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Abstract 4368647: Improving Center Performance Assessment in Congenital Heart Surgery Through Causal Inference Weighting Approaches

Larry Han, John E. Mayer, Katya Zelevinsky, Sara K. Pasquali, Haley Abing, Sharon‐Lise T. Normand, Meena Nathan
article en

Abstract

Background: Traditional congenital heart surgery quality assessments rely on indirect standardization via regression, which can be complicated by heterogeneity in case-mix, surgical volume, and low mortality rates. Our prior work revealed causal inference methods can better balance such differences across centers, yet these methods have not been widely studied to date. Aim: To compare quality assessments using traditional regression vs. causal inference weighting approaches. Methods: Using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (2016-22) for 10 Benchmark Operations (BMO), center observed:expected (O:E) operative mortality was calculated. Regression pooled all patients, adjusting for 21 covariates and 38 procedure-age random effects to estimate expected mortality. The causal approach divided observed mortality at each center by a weighted average of observed mortality at other centers using two weighting approaches (stable balancing [SBW] and covariate balancing propensity scores [CBPS]) and up to 204 covariates for balancing. O:E ratios (95% bootstrap intervals) were compared across methods. Results: Across 42,579 BMOs from 115 US centers (median age 462 days, 43% female), overall operative mortality was 2.37% (range: 0.38%-6.8% in centers with ≥100 operations). Regression yielded lower, less variable O:E ratios (mean=1.37 [SD=1.21]) than causal methods (SBW = 1.76 [2.30]; CBPS = 1.79 [2.47]; Panel A ). Lower volume centers had greater variability across estimates ( Panel B ). Regression classified fewer centers as having higher-than-expected mortality (9/115; 7.8%) compared to SBW (19/115; 17%) and CBPS (18/115; 15%); and more centers as lower-than-expected ( Panel C ). Compared to centers classified as higher-than-expected by all approaches, discordant centers had smaller volumes, treated more adults, and performed fewer higher complexity operations. Conclusions: Congenital heart surgery quality assessments are sensitive to the approach for case-mix adjustment. As causal inference approaches better account for such differences across centers and rely on fewer statistical assumptions, their adoption is encouraged.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), Northeastern University (US), Harvard University (US), University of Michigan (US), Michigan United (US), Boston Children's Museum (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.