Abstract 4367314: The Use of Common Cardiovascular Medications Is Associated With a Comparable Decreased Relative CVD Risk in Cancer Survivors and non-Cancer Patients

Introduction: The frequent coexistence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer, including due to shared risk factors, necessitates understanding the benefit of medications in CVD prevention in cancer survivors. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the use of statins, anti-hypertensives, and aspirin (ASA), provides equivalent CVD prevention for cancer and non-cancer patients for the same extent of CVD risk. Methods: We used data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, a cohort with 28 years of follow-up. After excluding those with prevalent cancer or CVD, the study population included 12,832 persons. Statin, anti-hypertensive, or ASA use was assessed by interview and bottle review at each study visit. Participants contributed time at risk of CVD until CVD diagnosis, cancer diagnosis, death, or administrative censoring, whichever came first. In the cancer survivor group, time at risk began at cancer diagnosis; participants with CVD diagnosed before cancer were excluded. Cox regression yielded the hazard ratio of CVD for medication use (time-varying) in those with and without cancer, adjusted for CVD risk factors * . As a sensitivity analysis and to increase the comparability of groups, Cox regression was performed on matched data where cancer and non-cancer participants were matched 1:1 using propensity scores based on clinical and demographic factors. Results: Table 1 displays baseline characteristics between the cancer and non-cancer groups. The number of those who developed incident CVD in the non-cancer group was 3653 out of 8814 participants. The number of those who developed incident CVD in the cancer group was 877 out of 2953 participants. Table 1 also displays the results of the proportional hazards models, including those obtained after propensity score matching. Across both the unmatched and matched analyses, statins, anti-hypertensives, and ASA were all associated with a decreased risk of incident CVD in both cancer and non-cancer groups. The hazard ratios were comparable between the matched and unmatched analyses. Conclusion: In this prospective study, statin, anti-hypertensive, and ASA use were associated with a comparable decreased CVD relative risk among those with and without cancer. This work suggests that cancer survivors may experience comparable CVD risk reduction benefit from these common medications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367314
Primary Topic
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367314: The Use of Common Cardiovascular Medications Is Associated With a Comparable Decreased Relative CVD Risk in Cancer Survivors and non-Cancer Patients

Álvaro Alonso, Shelby Kutty, Elizabeth J. Polter, Roberta Florido et al.
Circulation
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
article

Abstract 4367314: The Use of Common Cardiovascular Medications Is Associated With a Comparable Decreased Relative CVD Risk in Cancer Survivors and non-Cancer Patients

Álvaro Alonso, Shelby Kutty, Elizabeth J. Polter, Roberta Florido, Elizabeth A. Platz, Anne Hudson Blaes, Avirup Guha, Corinne E. Joshu, Anna E. Prizment, Nikhil Jaganathan, Sarah Malik
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The frequent coexistence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer, including due to shared risk factors, necessitates understanding the benefit of medications in CVD prevention in cancer survivors. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the use of statins, anti-hypertensives, and aspirin (ASA), provides equivalent CVD prevention for cancer and non-cancer patients for the same extent of CVD risk. Methods: We used data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, a cohort with 28 years of follow-up. After excluding those with prevalent cancer or CVD, the study population included 12,832 persons. Statin, anti-hypertensive, or ASA use was assessed by interview and bottle review at each study visit. Participants contributed time at risk of CVD until CVD diagnosis, cancer diagnosis, death, or administrative censoring, whichever came first. In the cancer survivor group, time at risk began at cancer diagnosis; participants with CVD diagnosed before cancer were excluded. Cox regression yielded the hazard ratio of CVD for medication use (time-varying) in those with and without cancer, adjusted for CVD risk factors * . As a sensitivity analysis and to increase the comparability of groups, Cox regression was performed on matched data where cancer and non-cancer participants were matched 1:1 using propensity scores based on clinical and demographic factors. Results: Table 1 displays baseline characteristics between the cancer and non-cancer groups. The number of those who developed incident CVD in the non-cancer group was 3653 out of 8814 participants. The number of those who developed incident CVD in the cancer group was 877 out of 2953 participants. Table 1 also displays the results of the proportional hazards models, including those obtained after propensity score matching. Across both the unmatched and matched analyses, statins, anti-hypertensives, and ASA were all associated with a decreased risk of incident CVD in both cancer and non-cancer groups. The hazard ratios were comparable between the matched and unmatched analyses. Conclusion: In this prospective study, statin, anti-hypertensive, and ASA use were associated with a comparable decreased CVD relative risk among those with and without cancer. This work suggests that cancer survivors may experience comparable CVD risk reduction benefit from these common medications.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), University of Utah (US), Augusta University (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.