Abstract Sun303: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received extracorporeal pulmonary resuscitation in Japan

Background: The influence of COVID-19 for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who received extracorporeal pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) was not fully elucidated. We examined whether there were differences in frequency and outcomes for OHCA patients who received ECPR during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using the JAAM-OHCA registry, which is a nationwide registry, we evaluated the OHCA patients who received ECPR from 2019-2022. Since the first state of emergency was declared in April, 2020, we compared outcomes for OHCA patient before COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020), and those during COVID-19 pandemic (from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022). We performed logistic regression analysis adjusted age, sex, witnessed cardiac arrest (CA), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, initial/on hospital arrival shockable rhythm, and time from call to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation and interrupted time series analysis (ITSA). Primary outcome was the proportion of 30-day neurological favorable outcome defined as Cerebral Performance Category scores of 1-2 between two groups. Results: After excluding patients, 1,903 ECPR cases (681 in pre-pandemic group and 1,222 in pandemic group) were included in the study period. ECPR frequency was decreased during pandemic (4.4% [681/15,344], 45.4 cases per month in pre-pandemic group, and 3.8% [1,222/32,020], 37.1 cases per month in pandemic group, OR 0.86 95%CI 0.78–0.94,p<0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with 30-day favorable neurological outcome (12.5% [85/681] in pre-pandemic group and 12.6% [154/1,221] in pandemic group, OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.67–1.30, p=0.64). ITSA revealed the frequency of ECPR decreased significantly (-17.2 per month, 95%CI -26.0–-8.5, p<0.01), while the proportion of 30-day neurological favorable outcomes did not differ (RR 1.16, 95%CI 0.70–1.96, p=0.56) during pandemic period. Conclusions: Although the frequency of ECPR for OHCA patients decreased, prognosis including favorable neurological outcomes did not differ during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sun303
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sun303: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received extracorporeal pulmonary resuscitation in Japan

Takefumi Tsunemitsu, Takeshi Nishimura, Taiki Moriyama, Shinichi Ijuin et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract Sun303: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who received extracorporeal pulmonary resuscitation in Japan

Takefumi Tsunemitsu, Takeshi Nishimura, Taiki Moriyama, Shinichi Ijuin, Yukihide Nakatani, Akihiko Inoue, H Kaneda, Satoshi Ishihara
article en

Abstract

Background: The influence of COVID-19 for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who received extracorporeal pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) was not fully elucidated. We examined whether there were differences in frequency and outcomes for OHCA patients who received ECPR during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Using the JAAM-OHCA registry, which is a nationwide registry, we evaluated the OHCA patients who received ECPR from 2019-2022. Since the first state of emergency was declared in April, 2020, we compared outcomes for OHCA patient before COVID-19 pandemic (from January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020), and those during COVID-19 pandemic (from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022). We performed logistic regression analysis adjusted age, sex, witnessed cardiac arrest (CA), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, initial/on hospital arrival shockable rhythm, and time from call to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation and interrupted time series analysis (ITSA). Primary outcome was the proportion of 30-day neurological favorable outcome defined as Cerebral Performance Category scores of 1-2 between two groups. Results: After excluding patients, 1,903 ECPR cases (681 in pre-pandemic group and 1,222 in pandemic group) were included in the study period. ECPR frequency was decreased during pandemic (4.4% [681/15,344], 45.4 cases per month in pre-pandemic group, and 3.8% [1,222/32,020], 37.1 cases per month in pandemic group, OR 0.86 95%CI 0.78–0.94,p<0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with 30-day favorable neurological outcome (12.5% [85/681] in pre-pandemic group and 12.6% [154/1,221] in pandemic group, OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.67–1.30, p=0.64). ITSA revealed the frequency of ECPR decreased significantly (-17.2 per month, 95%CI -26.0–-8.5, p<0.01), while the proportion of 30-day neurological favorable outcomes did not differ (RR 1.16, 95%CI 0.70–1.96, p=0.56) during pandemic period. Conclusions: Although the frequency of ECPR for OHCA patients decreased, prognosis including favorable neurological outcomes did not differ during COVID-19 pandemic.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Kobe Medical Center (JP), Kyoto University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.