Abstract Sun302: VASOPLEGIA IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH ECPR: RISK FACTORS, OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Background: Vasoplegia is persistent hypotension or sustained vasopressor requirement despite adequate fluid resuscitation, typically in the setting of elevated cardiac output. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) improves survival in patients with refractory cardiac arrest. However, the transition from a prolonged low-flow state to restored circulation often precipitates vasoplegic syndrome and subsequent circulatory collapse. The risk factors and outcomes of vasoplegic shock in ECPR are poorly defined. Methods: We analyzed all patients with refractory cardiac arrest who underwent ECPR using peripheral VA ECMO cannulation at our center between 2015 and 2024. After excluding patients with severe bleeding or obstructive shock, a total of 367 patients were included in the analysis. Results: In the first 24 h post ECMO cannulation, we identified two clusters: one with higher fluid balance (FB) and greater pressor use (P), and another with lower FB and lower P (Cluster A: N = 152, mean FB = 5938 ml, mean P = 2.89 vs Cluster B: N=215, mean FB=712 ml, mean P=1.01). Cluster A was older (59.1 vs 55.5 y, p=0.006), had higher BMI (32.2 vs 29.9, p= 0.003), more frequent HTN (55.8% vs 40.8 %, p=0.007) and use of ACE/ARB/ARNI ( 45% vs 32% p=0.02), CCB (20.7% vs 9.6%, p 0.006) and diuretics ( 34.5 % vs 23.7%, p=0.039); had more acidemia (Ph 7.23 vs 7.28, p=.006 and bicarb 17.6 vs 19, p=.004), higher lactate (13.2 vs 9.7, p<0.0001), lower temperature (92.4 vs 93.6, p=.04) and SVO2 (67.4 vs 70.6, p=.005), and higher need for IABP ( 69.7% vs 48.4% p<.001) and was treated with higher ECMO flows (3.8 vs 3.6 p=.0003). Cluster A had lower survival rates (10.5% vs 51.1%, p<.000001. Within cluster A, four quadrants were identified. The worst survival rates were in patients with high FB and high P (N=56,3.6% survival) followed by patients with high FB and low P (N=30, 6.7% survival) compared to patients with low FB and high P ( N=51, survival 17.6%) and patients with low FB and high p (N=15, survival 20%) (p=.049). Conclusions: Higher FB and increased P use within the first 24 h of ECMO cannulation were associated with worse survival in patients undergoing ECPR. This phenotype is linked to prior antihypertensive medication use and lactic acidosis. Notably, higher FB was linked to worse outcomes compared to high P use, within the vasoplegic phenotype, raising important considerations about the detrimental effect of positive fluid balance in this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sun302
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sun302: VASOPLEGIA IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH ECPR: RISK FACTORS, OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Andrea Elliott, Rajat Kalra, Jason A. Bartos, Alejandra Gutiérrez et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract Sun302: VASOPLEGIA IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH ECPR: RISK FACTORS, OUTCOMES AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Andrea Elliott, Rajat Kalra, Jason A. Bartos, Alejandra Gutiérrez, Effimia Zacharia, Tamás Alexy, Demetris Yannopoulos
article en

Abstract

Background: Vasoplegia is persistent hypotension or sustained vasopressor requirement despite adequate fluid resuscitation, typically in the setting of elevated cardiac output. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) improves survival in patients with refractory cardiac arrest. However, the transition from a prolonged low-flow state to restored circulation often precipitates vasoplegic syndrome and subsequent circulatory collapse. The risk factors and outcomes of vasoplegic shock in ECPR are poorly defined. Methods: We analyzed all patients with refractory cardiac arrest who underwent ECPR using peripheral VA ECMO cannulation at our center between 2015 and 2024. After excluding patients with severe bleeding or obstructive shock, a total of 367 patients were included in the analysis. Results: In the first 24 h post ECMO cannulation, we identified two clusters: one with higher fluid balance (FB) and greater pressor use (P), and another with lower FB and lower P (Cluster A: N = 152, mean FB = 5938 ml, mean P = 2.89 vs Cluster B: N=215, mean FB=712 ml, mean P=1.01). Cluster A was older (59.1 vs 55.5 y, p=0.006), had higher BMI (32.2 vs 29.9, p= 0.003), more frequent HTN (55.8% vs 40.8 %, p=0.007) and use of ACE/ARB/ARNI ( 45% vs 32% p=0.02), CCB (20.7% vs 9.6%, p 0.006) and diuretics ( 34.5 % vs 23.7%, p=0.039); had more acidemia (Ph 7.23 vs 7.28, p=.006 and bicarb 17.6 vs 19, p=.004), higher lactate (13.2 vs 9.7, p<0.0001), lower temperature (92.4 vs 93.6, p=.04) and SVO2 (67.4 vs 70.6, p=.005), and higher need for IABP ( 69.7% vs 48.4% p<.001) and was treated with higher ECMO flows (3.8 vs 3.6 p=.0003). Cluster A had lower survival rates (10.5% vs 51.1%, p<.000001. Within cluster A, four quadrants were identified. The worst survival rates were in patients with high FB and high P (N=56,3.6% survival) followed by patients with high FB and low P (N=30, 6.7% survival) compared to patients with low FB and high P ( N=51, survival 17.6%) and patients with low FB and high p (N=15, survival 20%) (p=.049). Conclusions: Higher FB and increased P use within the first 24 h of ECMO cannulation were associated with worse survival in patients undergoing ECPR. This phenotype is linked to prior antihypertensive medication use and lactic acidosis. Notably, higher FB was linked to worse outcomes compared to high P use, within the vasoplegic phenotype, raising important considerations about the detrimental effect of positive fluid balance in this patient population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Minnesota System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.