Abstract 4367357: Enrollment strategies that yield a representative and generalizable trial population for hypertension research.

Background: Clinical trial participants often do not represent patients with hypertension in the real world, which limits the generalizability of findings. In our pragmatic multicenter hybrid effectiveness implementation randomized controlled trial, we used electronic health records (EHR) to automate the identification of patients aged 65 years and older with uncontrolled hypertension. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the enrolled participants would be similar to the clinic populations due to the use of EHR, broader inclusion criteria, remote nature of the study, and low trial burden on participants. Methods: We compared enrolled participants with those who were eligible but did not enroll in the study. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the EHR. Univariate ANOVA tests were performed to compare characteristics across three groups: enrolled, eligible but declined participation, and eligible but unreachable. We conducted a multiple logistic regression with stepwise feature selection against the enrollment indicator to demonstrate representativeness. Results: From the pool of >60,000 patients who had clinic visits during enrollment, 10,526 patients were automatically identified, and 5,311 were eligible and included in these analyses. Among those eligible, 18.8% enrolled, 53.5% declined to participate, and 27.6% were unreachable. The mean age of the enrolled patients was slightly less than that of patients who were not enrolled (73(5.6) vs 75 (6.2) years). Sex distribution was similar across all three eligible groups. The proportion of non-white race/ethnicity among those who declined was slightly higher. The qualifying systolic blood pressure (clinic blood pressure used for inclusion criteria) was lower in the enrolled compared to the unenrolled groups (151 vs 154 mmHg). The enrolled group had a lower proportion of patients with chronic kidney disease, stroke, or a history of cigarette smoking compared to the unenrolled group. When analyzing the entire unenrolled cohort (i.e., declined and unreachable) using multivariable logistic regression, a higher number of antihypertensive medications was associated with trial enrollment. Conclusion: A pragmatic approach and automated identification of potential participants through EHR enrollment yielded a cohort of participants very similar to the eligible but unenrolled clinic population, which will enhance the generalizability of the trial’s findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367357
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367357: Enrollment strategies that yield a representative and generalizable trial population for hypertension research.

Molly B. Conroy, Emmanuel A. Adomako, Kate Young, Danya Pradeep Kumar et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4367357: Enrollment strategies that yield a representative and generalizable trial population for hypertension research.

Molly B. Conroy, Emmanuel A. Adomako, Kate Young, Danya Pradeep Kumar, Madhuri Ramakrishnan, Noor Abu-el-rub, Aditi Gupta, Xing Song, Jeffrey Murray Burns, Sravani Chandaka, Mark A. Supiano, Jonathan D. Mahnken
article en

Abstract

Background: Clinical trial participants often do not represent patients with hypertension in the real world, which limits the generalizability of findings. In our pragmatic multicenter hybrid effectiveness implementation randomized controlled trial, we used electronic health records (EHR) to automate the identification of patients aged 65 years and older with uncontrolled hypertension. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the enrolled participants would be similar to the clinic populations due to the use of EHR, broader inclusion criteria, remote nature of the study, and low trial burden on participants. Methods: We compared enrolled participants with those who were eligible but did not enroll in the study. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the EHR. Univariate ANOVA tests were performed to compare characteristics across three groups: enrolled, eligible but declined participation, and eligible but unreachable. We conducted a multiple logistic regression with stepwise feature selection against the enrollment indicator to demonstrate representativeness. Results: From the pool of >60,000 patients who had clinic visits during enrollment, 10,526 patients were automatically identified, and 5,311 were eligible and included in these analyses. Among those eligible, 18.8% enrolled, 53.5% declined to participate, and 27.6% were unreachable. The mean age of the enrolled patients was slightly less than that of patients who were not enrolled (73(5.6) vs 75 (6.2) years). Sex distribution was similar across all three eligible groups. The proportion of non-white race/ethnicity among those who declined was slightly higher. The qualifying systolic blood pressure (clinic blood pressure used for inclusion criteria) was lower in the enrolled compared to the unenrolled groups (151 vs 154 mmHg). The enrolled group had a lower proportion of patients with chronic kidney disease, stroke, or a history of cigarette smoking compared to the unenrolled group. When analyzing the entire unenrolled cohort (i.e., declined and unreachable) using multivariable logistic regression, a higher number of antihypertensive medications was associated with trial enrollment. Conclusion: A pragmatic approach and automated identification of potential participants through EHR enrollment yielded a cohort of participants very similar to the eligible but unenrolled clinic population, which will enhance the generalizability of the trial’s findings.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Utah (US), Spencer Foundation (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.