Abstract 4369128: Insulin Sensitivity and Inflammation: Key Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in middle-aged and older adults. Both the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), and hs-CRP have been identified as important risk factors for CVD. However, their combined influence on CVD risk in this population remains inadequately explored. Aim: This study aims to investigate the association between eGDR, hs-CRP, and the risk of CVD in middle-aged and older adults. Methods: Data were from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which included 17,708 participants at baseline in 2011. After excluding those with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and missing follow-up data, 6,823 participants were enrolled. eGDR was calculated using the following formula: eGDR=24.31−(0.22×Waist Circumference)−(0.33×Systolic Blood Pressure)+(0.43×Fasting Plasma Glucose)eGDR=24.31−(0.22×Waist Circumference)−(0.33×Systolic Blood Pressure)+(0.43×Fasting Plasma Glucose). eGDR was categorized according to quartiles. The primary outcome was the incidence of heart diseases and stroke. Results: Among the 6,823 participants enrolled, the mean age was 59.14 ± 8.75 years, and 3,080 (45.1%) were male. During a maximum follow-up period of 9 years, 1,950 (28.6%) developed CVD. After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of CVD incidence was highest in the lowest quartile (Q1) of eGDR compared to the highest quartile (Q4) (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.38-1.88), followed by Q2 (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16-1.54). Elevated hs-CRP levels (≥2 mg/L) were associated with a 1.15-fold increased risk of CVD (95% CI: 1.04-1.27) compared to lower hs-CRP levels (<2 mg/L). When considering both eGDR and hs-CRP levels, the combined effect revealed the highest risk in individuals with the lowest eGDR (Q1) and elevated hs-CRP (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.44-2.12), followed by those with Q1 of eGDR and low hs-CRP (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.34-1.89), Q2 of eGDR with high hs-CRP (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.22-1.84), and Q2 of eGDR with low hs-CRP (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.12-1.54) (Table 1) Conclusion: In this large real-world study, we found that individuals with high eGDR and elevated hs-CRP had the highest risk of CVD. These findings highlight the combined role of insulin sensitivity and inflammation in predicting CVD risk and provide valuable insights into cardiovascular risk, aiding in early detection and targeted prevention strategies for CVD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369128
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369128: Insulin Sensitivity and Inflammation: Key Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Kexin Zhang, Yunqing Ye, Kailun Yan, Jinqing Yuan et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4369128: Insulin Sensitivity and Inflammation: Key Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Kexin Zhang, Yunqing Ye, Kailun Yan, Jinqing Yuan, Menglu Liu, Jiawen Li, Xueyan Zhao
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in middle-aged and older adults. Both the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), and hs-CRP have been identified as important risk factors for CVD. However, their combined influence on CVD risk in this population remains inadequately explored. Aim: This study aims to investigate the association between eGDR, hs-CRP, and the risk of CVD in middle-aged and older adults. Methods: Data were from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which included 17,708 participants at baseline in 2011. After excluding those with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and missing follow-up data, 6,823 participants were enrolled. eGDR was calculated using the following formula: eGDR=24.31−(0.22×Waist Circumference)−(0.33×Systolic Blood Pressure)+(0.43×Fasting Plasma Glucose)eGDR=24.31−(0.22×Waist Circumference)−(0.33×Systolic Blood Pressure)+(0.43×Fasting Plasma Glucose). eGDR was categorized according to quartiles. The primary outcome was the incidence of heart diseases and stroke. Results: Among the 6,823 participants enrolled, the mean age was 59.14 ± 8.75 years, and 3,080 (45.1%) were male. During a maximum follow-up period of 9 years, 1,950 (28.6%) developed CVD. After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of CVD incidence was highest in the lowest quartile (Q1) of eGDR compared to the highest quartile (Q4) (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.38-1.88), followed by Q2 (HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16-1.54). Elevated hs-CRP levels (≥2 mg/L) were associated with a 1.15-fold increased risk of CVD (95% CI: 1.04-1.27) compared to lower hs-CRP levels (<2 mg/L). When considering both eGDR and hs-CRP levels, the combined effect revealed the highest risk in individuals with the lowest eGDR (Q1) and elevated hs-CRP (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.44-2.12), followed by those with Q1 of eGDR and low hs-CRP (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.34-1.89), Q2 of eGDR with high hs-CRP (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.22-1.84), and Q2 of eGDR with low hs-CRP (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.12-1.54) (Table 1) Conclusion: In this large real-world study, we found that individuals with high eGDR and elevated hs-CRP had the highest risk of CVD. These findings highlight the combined role of insulin sensitivity and inflammation in predicting CVD risk and provide valuable insights into cardiovascular risk, aiding in early detection and targeted prevention strategies for CVD.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Fu Wai Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.