Abstract 4347763: Comparative Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-driven Electrocardiography Score with Traditional Risk Stratification Tools for Perioperative Risk Assessment in Non-cardiac Surgery

Background: The role of electrocardiography (ECG) has been limited in the preoperative risk evaluation in noncardiac surgery due to its low prognostic value. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the extraction of subtle features from ECG that can be used in risk prediction. Research Question: Can AI-enabled ECG predict 30-day postoperative mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, outperforming conventional risk stratification tools? Methods: A retrospective cohort of 46,135 adults who underwent non-cardiac surgery at a tertiary center between 2020 and 2021 was analyzed. Preoperative ECG images acquired within 30 days before surgery were used as input to a previously developed CNN-based deep-learning algorithm to generate QCG-Critical score – a probability score ranging from 0 to 100 – that reflects the risk for critical conditions such as shock, respiratory failure, and cardiac arrest. The QCG-Critical score was evaluated for its ability to predict 30-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 7-day mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and heart failure within 30 days postoperatively. Results: The overall 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 0.34%. Patients with higher QCG-Critical score showed increased mortality, with a 30-day postoperative morality rate of 11.7% among patients with scores >40. The QCG-Critical score demonstrated strong predictive performance for 30-day mortality (AUROC: 0.909), outperforming the ESC guidelines (0.728) and RCRI (0.725), and was comparable to the ASA classification (0.886). The performance of QCG-Critical score remained consistent across subgroups stratified by age, sex, emergency operation, anesthesia type, and conventional risk groups. The QCG-Critical score also demonstrated good performance for predicting 7-day mortality (AUROC: 0.933), unplanned PCI (0.857), prolonged mechanical ventilation (0.829), and heart failure (0.774). Conclusion: The preoperative QCG-Critical score accurately predicted postoperative mortality and other adverse outcomes, outperforming conventional risk stratification tools. The QCG-Critical may serve as a fast, accessible, and integrable tool for perioperative risk assessments in routine surgical care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4347763
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4347763: Comparative Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-driven Electrocardiography Score with Traditional Risk Stratification Tools for Perioperative Risk Assessment in Non-cardiac Surgery

Hong‐Mi Choi, Yeon-Yee Yoon, Il‐Young Oh, Joonghee Kim et al.
Circulation
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Abstract 4347763: Comparative Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-driven Electrocardiography Score with Traditional Risk Stratification Tools for Perioperative Risk Assessment in Non-cardiac Surgery

Hong‐Mi Choi, Yeon-Yee Yoon, Il‐Young Oh, Joonghee Kim, Ji Hyun Lee, Ye-Rin Kim, Youngjin Cho, In‐Ae Song, Jiesuck Park
article en

Abstract

Background: The role of electrocardiography (ECG) has been limited in the preoperative risk evaluation in noncardiac surgery due to its low prognostic value. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the extraction of subtle features from ECG that can be used in risk prediction. Research Question: Can AI-enabled ECG predict 30-day postoperative mortality in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, outperforming conventional risk stratification tools? Methods: A retrospective cohort of 46,135 adults who underwent non-cardiac surgery at a tertiary center between 2020 and 2021 was analyzed. Preoperative ECG images acquired within 30 days before surgery were used as input to a previously developed CNN-based deep-learning algorithm to generate QCG-Critical score – a probability score ranging from 0 to 100 – that reflects the risk for critical conditions such as shock, respiratory failure, and cardiac arrest. The QCG-Critical score was evaluated for its ability to predict 30-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 7-day mortality, prolonged mechanical ventilation, unplanned percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and heart failure within 30 days postoperatively. Results: The overall 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 0.34%. Patients with higher QCG-Critical score showed increased mortality, with a 30-day postoperative morality rate of 11.7% among patients with scores >40. The QCG-Critical score demonstrated strong predictive performance for 30-day mortality (AUROC: 0.909), outperforming the ESC guidelines (0.728) and RCRI (0.725), and was comparable to the ASA classification (0.886). The performance of QCG-Critical score remained consistent across subgroups stratified by age, sex, emergency operation, anesthesia type, and conventional risk groups. The QCG-Critical score also demonstrated good performance for predicting 7-day mortality (AUROC: 0.933), unplanned PCI (0.857), prolonged mechanical ventilation (0.829), and heart failure (0.774). Conclusion: The preoperative QCG-Critical score accurately predicted postoperative mortality and other adverse outcomes, outperforming conventional risk stratification tools. The QCG-Critical may serve as a fast, accessible, and integrable tool for perioperative risk assessments in routine surgical care.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.