Abstract 4367343: Transgender Male and Gender Non-Binary/Genderqueer Patients are Less Likely to Receive Guideline-Indicated Cardiovascular Care than Cisgender Patients: A Nationwide Study

Introduction: People identifying as transgender, non-binary, or genderqueer are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease. Additionally, bias and overt discrimination limit care access and could impact care quality for this patient population. Research Question/Aims: To understand whether disparities in cardiovascular care quality exist for patients who identify as transgender or non-binary/genderqueer in routine clinical practice. Methods: We used data from Epic Cosmos, a dataset of Epic Health systems representing more than 300 million patient records, from January 1, 2021-December 31, 2024. Epic Cosmos collects harmonized patient gender identity information from participating health systems, with completion rates between 14-20% during the study period. Gender identity was classified as follows: cisgender male, cisgender female, transgender male, transgender female, gender non-binary/genderqueer (inclusive of gender non-binary, other gender, or genderqueer, which were grouped due to low sample size), and choose not to respond. Rates of achievement of key cardiovascular care quality metrics were calculated for patients of each gender identity group. Figure 1 details the criteria for eligibility and achievement of each care quality metric. Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with a reference group of cisgender male for transgender male patients, cisgender female for transgender female patients, and cisgender (male or female) for gender non-binary/genderqueer patients. Results: Figure 2 shows the number of eligible patients and number of patients meeting criteria for each quality metric by gender identity. Figure 3 summarizes the rate ratios of metric achievement for each group. In summary, patients identifying as genderqueer/non-binary were less likely to receive lipid lowering therapy after a measured LDL >190 and were less likely to have SBP 140-159 or SBP >160 treated. Transgender male patients were less likely to receive beta blocker, statin, or antithrombotic therapy after acute myocardial infarction, and were less likely to have LDL >190 treated or to have SBP 140-159 or SBP >160 treated. Conclusions: Transgender male and non-binary/genderqueer patients appear to be less likely to receive some guideline-indicated cardiovascular care. Quality improvement programs should pay attention to these particularly high-risk patient populations to promote equitable delivery of cardiovascular care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367343
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367343: Transgender Male and Gender Non-Binary/Genderqueer Patients are Less Likely to Receive Guideline-Indicated Cardiovascular Care than Cisgender Patients: A Nationwide Study

Fan Li, Nicole Rosendale, Jay B. Lusk, Brian Mac Grory et al.
Circulation
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

Abstract 4367343: Transgender Male and Gender Non-Binary/Genderqueer Patients are Less Likely to Receive Guideline-Indicated Cardiovascular Care than Cisgender Patients: A Nationwide Study

Fan Li, Nicole Rosendale, Jay B. Lusk, Brian Mac Grory, Shannon Aymes, Emily C. O’Brien, Cheryl Kalapura
article en

Abstract

Introduction: People identifying as transgender, non-binary, or genderqueer are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease. Additionally, bias and overt discrimination limit care access and could impact care quality for this patient population. Research Question/Aims: To understand whether disparities in cardiovascular care quality exist for patients who identify as transgender or non-binary/genderqueer in routine clinical practice. Methods: We used data from Epic Cosmos, a dataset of Epic Health systems representing more than 300 million patient records, from January 1, 2021-December 31, 2024. Epic Cosmos collects harmonized patient gender identity information from participating health systems, with completion rates between 14-20% during the study period. Gender identity was classified as follows: cisgender male, cisgender female, transgender male, transgender female, gender non-binary/genderqueer (inclusive of gender non-binary, other gender, or genderqueer, which were grouped due to low sample size), and choose not to respond. Rates of achievement of key cardiovascular care quality metrics were calculated for patients of each gender identity group. Figure 1 details the criteria for eligibility and achievement of each care quality metric. Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with a reference group of cisgender male for transgender male patients, cisgender female for transgender female patients, and cisgender (male or female) for gender non-binary/genderqueer patients. Results: Figure 2 shows the number of eligible patients and number of patients meeting criteria for each quality metric by gender identity. Figure 3 summarizes the rate ratios of metric achievement for each group. In summary, patients identifying as genderqueer/non-binary were less likely to receive lipid lowering therapy after a measured LDL >190 and were less likely to have SBP 140-159 or SBP >160 treated. Transgender male patients were less likely to receive beta blocker, statin, or antithrombotic therapy after acute myocardial infarction, and were less likely to have LDL >190 treated or to have SBP 140-159 or SBP >160 treated. Conclusions: Transgender male and non-binary/genderqueer patients appear to be less likely to receive some guideline-indicated cardiovascular care. Quality improvement programs should pay attention to these particularly high-risk patient populations to promote equitable delivery of cardiovascular care.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
City College of San Francisco (US), Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.