Abstract 4370982: Disparities in Demographic Representation in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: A Systemic Analysis of Enrollment Patterns and Their Impact on Health Equity

Introduction: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures in the U.S. Despite its disproportionate burden on certain racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups, clinical trials often fail to reflect this demographic imbalance. This lack of representation compromises trial validity, contributing to healthcare disparities and increasing costs. Accurate demographic representation in clinical trials is essential for improving outcomes and reducing inequities. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that there is a significant mismatch between the demographic composition of patients diagnosed with HFrEF and those enrolled in U.S.-based clinical trials, contributing to clinical disparities and elevated healthcare costs. Methods: We performed a systematic analysis using data from ClinicalTrials.gov, including heart failure clinical trials with over 2.95 million participants. Demographic distributions by race, ethnicity, and gender were examined. To assess inclusivity, we calculated Enrollment Fractions (EF), the ratio of trial enrollees to the estimated U.S. disease prevalence in each demographic group. Statistical analysis was conducted using Python, with a significance threshold of p < 0.001. Results: A total of 161 clinical trials, comprising 2.95 million participants, were analyzed. Of these, 758,721 (25.7%) were male and 1,008,409 (34.2%) were female. Racial distribution was skewed, with 45.7% Caucasian, 4.8% African American, and 0.7% Latino participants. Enrollment fractions for these groups were 4.12 for Caucasians, 0.21 for African Americans, and 0.04 for Latinos. Enrollment fractions for men and women were 1.37 and 0.72, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant disparities across racial and gender groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Heart failure clinical trials show substantial demographic imbalances, with African American and Latino populations severely underrepresented. Men are enrolled at twice the rate of women, and Caucasians are represented 20 times more than African Americans and 100 times more than Latinos. These disparities emphasize the need for targeted recruitment strategies and policy reforms to ensure equitable representation. Addressing these inequities could help reduce healthcare disparities and the economic burden on underserved populations, ultimately advancing health equity and improving outcomes across diverse groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370982
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370982: Disparities in Demographic Representation in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: A Systemic Analysis of Enrollment Patterns and Their Impact on Health Equity

Chima Amadi, Samed Obeng, Akshay Chandora, Ridwan Azees et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4370982: Disparities in Demographic Representation in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: A Systemic Analysis of Enrollment Patterns and Their Impact on Health Equity

Chima Amadi, Samed Obeng, Akshay Chandora, Ridwan Azees, Dimitri Ford, Berlandson Saint Julien, Michael S. N. Opare-Addo
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures in the U.S. Despite its disproportionate burden on certain racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups, clinical trials often fail to reflect this demographic imbalance. This lack of representation compromises trial validity, contributing to healthcare disparities and increasing costs. Accurate demographic representation in clinical trials is essential for improving outcomes and reducing inequities. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that there is a significant mismatch between the demographic composition of patients diagnosed with HFrEF and those enrolled in U.S.-based clinical trials, contributing to clinical disparities and elevated healthcare costs. Methods: We performed a systematic analysis using data from ClinicalTrials.gov, including heart failure clinical trials with over 2.95 million participants. Demographic distributions by race, ethnicity, and gender were examined. To assess inclusivity, we calculated Enrollment Fractions (EF), the ratio of trial enrollees to the estimated U.S. disease prevalence in each demographic group. Statistical analysis was conducted using Python, with a significance threshold of p < 0.001. Results: A total of 161 clinical trials, comprising 2.95 million participants, were analyzed. Of these, 758,721 (25.7%) were male and 1,008,409 (34.2%) were female. Racial distribution was skewed, with 45.7% Caucasian, 4.8% African American, and 0.7% Latino participants. Enrollment fractions for these groups were 4.12 for Caucasians, 0.21 for African Americans, and 0.04 for Latinos. Enrollment fractions for men and women were 1.37 and 0.72, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant disparities across racial and gender groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Heart failure clinical trials show substantial demographic imbalances, with African American and Latino populations severely underrepresented. Men are enrolled at twice the rate of women, and Caucasians are represented 20 times more than African Americans and 100 times more than Latinos. These disparities emphasize the need for targeted recruitment strategies and policy reforms to ensure equitable representation. Addressing these inequities could help reduce healthcare disparities and the economic burden on underserved populations, ultimately advancing health equity and improving outcomes across diverse groups.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.