Abstract 4364288: Increasing Rates of Lipoprotein(a) Testing in the United States from 2015-2024: An Analysis of 300 Million Individuals

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined biomarker associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Elevated Lp(a) is common, with approximately 1 in 5 individuals having Lp(a) >50 mg/dL (>125 nmol/L). However, Lp(a) testing remains underutilized in clinical practice, and limited data on national testing trends are available. Methods: This study includes data from Epic Cosmos, a nationwide, de-identified electronic health record dataset comprising over 300 million patients, between January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2024. We evaluated the number of distinct patients tested for Lp(a) per year, the testing rate per annual patient population, geographical variation, and percentages of patients tested stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, and race. Results: From 2015 to 2024, a total of 728,550 (0.2% of U.S. population) distinct patients underwent Lp(a) testing, the annual number of tested patients increased significantly from 14,471 in 2015 to 309,806 in 2024 ( χ 2 <span style="font-size:10.8333px"> </span> test, p<0.001), and the annual percentage of the total patient population undergoing Lp(a) testing increased from 0.03% in 2015 to 0.24% in 2024. The highest number of tests were performed in California (11.6%), Ohio (8.6%), and Texas (7.6%). Age-stratified analyses revealed that testing was most frequently conducted among adults between the ages of 50-65 years (253,409 patients; 34.8%). Lp(a) testing rates were similar by sex, with 51.8% (377,053) among males and 48.2% (351,384) among females. Among patients undergoing testing with reported ethnic identity, only 51,950 (7.1%) identified as Hispanic or Latino, while the remaining 676,600 (92.9%) identified as non-Hispanic. Most patients undergoing testing with reported racial data identified as White (581,101; 79.8%), followed by Other Race (82,320; 11.3%), Black or African American (65,683; 9.0%), Asian (44,131; 6.1%), and fewer non-Hispanic individuals identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native or selecting “None of the above”. Conclusion: Although the number of Lp(a) tests has increased significantly over the past decade, persistently low rates of testing and the variation by region, age and race/ethnicity suggest that further efforts are needed to promote standardized Lp(a) screening guidelines nationwide. Further research is needed to understand the drivers of these trends and to optimize the use of Lp(a) testing for cardiovascular risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364288
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364288: Increasing Rates of Lipoprotein(a) Testing in the United States from 2015-2024: An Analysis of 300 Million Individuals

Ehtisham Mahmud, Mattheus Ramsis, Harpreet Bhatia, Pam R. Taub et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4364288: Increasing Rates of Lipoprotein(a) Testing in the United States from 2015-2024: An Analysis of 300 Million Individuals

Ehtisham Mahmud, Mattheus Ramsis, Harpreet Bhatia, Pam R. Taub, Michael Wilkinson, Mustafa Naguib, Marissa Dzotsi
article en

Abstract

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined biomarker associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Elevated Lp(a) is common, with approximately 1 in 5 individuals having Lp(a) >50 mg/dL (>125 nmol/L). However, Lp(a) testing remains underutilized in clinical practice, and limited data on national testing trends are available. Methods: This study includes data from Epic Cosmos, a nationwide, de-identified electronic health record dataset comprising over 300 million patients, between January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2024. We evaluated the number of distinct patients tested for Lp(a) per year, the testing rate per annual patient population, geographical variation, and percentages of patients tested stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, and race. Results: From 2015 to 2024, a total of 728,550 (0.2% of U.S. population) distinct patients underwent Lp(a) testing, the annual number of tested patients increased significantly from 14,471 in 2015 to 309,806 in 2024 ( χ 2 <span style="font-size:10.8333px"> </span> test, p<0.001), and the annual percentage of the total patient population undergoing Lp(a) testing increased from 0.03% in 2015 to 0.24% in 2024. The highest number of tests were performed in California (11.6%), Ohio (8.6%), and Texas (7.6%). Age-stratified analyses revealed that testing was most frequently conducted among adults between the ages of 50-65 years (253,409 patients; 34.8%). Lp(a) testing rates were similar by sex, with 51.8% (377,053) among males and 48.2% (351,384) among females. Among patients undergoing testing with reported ethnic identity, only 51,950 (7.1%) identified as Hispanic or Latino, while the remaining 676,600 (92.9%) identified as non-Hispanic. Most patients undergoing testing with reported racial data identified as White (581,101; 79.8%), followed by Other Race (82,320; 11.3%), Black or African American (65,683; 9.0%), Asian (44,131; 6.1%), and fewer non-Hispanic individuals identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native or selecting “None of the above”. Conclusion: Although the number of Lp(a) tests has increased significantly over the past decade, persistently low rates of testing and the variation by region, age and race/ethnicity suggest that further efforts are needed to promote standardized Lp(a) screening guidelines nationwide. Further research is needed to understand the drivers of these trends and to optimize the use of Lp(a) testing for cardiovascular risk stratification.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of California San Diego Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.