Abstract 4367370: Comparative Outcomes of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Arrhythmias in ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Catheter ablation is an important rhythm control strategy for atrial arrhythmias. Arrhythmia recurrence rates are higher in amyloid than in non-amyloid populations. In this meta-analysis, we aim to quantify the risk of heart failure hospitalizations and mortality in patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing catheter ablation compared to those without ablation. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies comparing catheter ablation versus no ablation in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial arrhythmias. Eligible studies reported clinical outcomes stratified by treatment group. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) version 9.3.0 with a random-effects model. Outcomes included HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Heart failure hospitalization was assessed through two separate analyses based on data availability: a pooled rate ratio meta-analysis using event rates adjusted for person-years of follow-up, and a separate meta-analysis using hazard ratios. Effect sizes were reported as rate ratios and HRs with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Three retrospective cohort studies comprising 231 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial arrhythmias were included. Median follow-up ranged from 37.2 to 60 months. Patients were predominantly male (70.8%–83%), with mean ages ranging from 74 to 81 years. Catheter ablation significantly reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to no ablation (rate ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.11–0.46), and (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.61). All-cause mortality was also significantly lower in the ablation group (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24–0.73). No significant heterogeneity was observed across studies in any of the analyses. Conclusion: Catheter ablation was associated with a significant reduction in HF hospitalizations and all-cause mortality. Prior meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials in non-amyloid populations have shown similar effects. However the magnitude of benefit observed in ATTR-CM appears more pronounced. This likely reflects the amplified hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation in amyloid hearts, where rapid ventricular rates and loss of atrial contraction can precipitate decompensation. While randomized trials are lacking, the consistency across observational data underscores the potential of catheter ablation to reduce morbidity and mortality in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367370
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367370: Comparative Outcomes of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Arrhythmias in ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jorge Sinclair, Lorenzo J. Olivero, Sridhar Mangalesh, Antony Gonzales-Uribe et al.
Circulation
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

Abstract 4367370: Comparative Outcomes of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Arrhythmias in ATTR Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jorge Sinclair, Lorenzo J. Olivero, Sridhar Mangalesh, Antony Gonzales-Uribe, Santiago Saenz Ancira, Robert Faillace, Diana Jaen
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Catheter ablation is an important rhythm control strategy for atrial arrhythmias. Arrhythmia recurrence rates are higher in amyloid than in non-amyloid populations. In this meta-analysis, we aim to quantify the risk of heart failure hospitalizations and mortality in patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing catheter ablation compared to those without ablation. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies comparing catheter ablation versus no ablation in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial arrhythmias. Eligible studies reported clinical outcomes stratified by treatment group. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) version 9.3.0 with a random-effects model. Outcomes included HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Heart failure hospitalization was assessed through two separate analyses based on data availability: a pooled rate ratio meta-analysis using event rates adjusted for person-years of follow-up, and a separate meta-analysis using hazard ratios. Effect sizes were reported as rate ratios and HRs with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Three retrospective cohort studies comprising 231 patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial arrhythmias were included. Median follow-up ranged from 37.2 to 60 months. Patients were predominantly male (70.8%–83%), with mean ages ranging from 74 to 81 years. Catheter ablation significantly reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalization compared to no ablation (rate ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.11–0.46), and (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.61). All-cause mortality was also significantly lower in the ablation group (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24–0.73). No significant heterogeneity was observed across studies in any of the analyses. Conclusion: Catheter ablation was associated with a significant reduction in HF hospitalizations and all-cause mortality. Prior meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials in non-amyloid populations have shown similar effects. However the magnitude of benefit observed in ATTR-CM appears more pronounced. This likely reflects the amplified hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation in amyloid hearts, where rapid ventricular rates and loss of atrial contraction can precipitate decompensation. While randomized trials are lacking, the consistency across observational data underscores the potential of catheter ablation to reduce morbidity and mortality in this high-risk population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Jacobi Medical Center (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.