Abstract 4370155: Comparison of baseline EKG parameters between the first and second Heart xenotransplant

Background: The 1 st and 2 nd genetically modified porcine-to-human cardiac xenotransplantations were performed at the University of Maryland in January 2022 and September 2023, respectively. The recipients survived for 60 and 41 days, respectively. Methods: Daily 12-lead EKGs were obtained during the postoperative days (POD). Standard baseline parameters were analyzed from non-paced EKGs. Results: The average heart rate (HR) was similar between the 1 st and 2 nd xenotransplant with a HR difference of 1.9±3.0 (75.0±10.0bpm vs 73.1±16.7bpm, P=0.13) with no significant differences in HR over POD 1-20 (79.0±12.0bpm vs 78.15±8.5bpm, P=0.33) or POD 21-40 (70.0±7.0bpm vs 69.9±19.8bpm, P=0.34; Figure 1A). The average PR interval was significantly longer in the 1 st xenotransplant compared to the 2 nd, with a difference of 55.2±6.2ms (212.0±20.0ms vs 156.8±32.5ms, P<0.001). This was consistent during POD 1-20 (200.0±15.0ms vs 145.0±28.4.0ms, P<0.001) and POD 21-40 (228.0±18.0ms vs 171.7±32.0ms, P<0.001; Figure 1B). QRS width (ventricular depolarization) was significantly longer in the 1 st xenotransplant compared to the 2 nd, with a difference of 64.6±3.6ms (145.0±16.0ms vs 80.4±17.7ms, P<0.001). This was seen during POD 1-20 (154.0±19.0ms vs 82.5±15.5ms, P<0.001) as well as POD 21-40 (151.0±14.0ms vs 78.6±20.4, P<0.001; Figure 1C). Similarly, the QT interval (ventricular repolarization) was significantly longer in the 1 st xenotransplant compared to the 2 nd, with a difference of 132.1±9.7 (509.0±51.0ms vs 376.9±42.4ms, P<0.001). The longer QT interval was seen during POD 1-20 (504.0±57.0ms vs 377.75±43.0ms, P<0.001) and POD 21-40 (502.0±56.0ms vs 373.1±42.8ms, P<0.001; Figure 1D). Accordingly, the QTc interval was longer in the 1 st xenotransplant with a difference of 158.2 ± 11.7ms (568.0±55.0ms vs 409.8±55.6ms, P<0.001), which was consistent during POD 1- 20 (591.0±52.0ms vs 429.8±53.0ms, P<0.001) and POD 21-40 (141.5±16.2 (535.0±51.0ms vs 393.4±45.9ms, P<0.001; Figure 1E). Conclusion: Significant differences in AV nodal conduction, ventricular depolarization and repolarization timings were seen between the 1 st and 2 nd xenotransplanted patient with the latter more closely approximating the average ECG intervals seen in porcine hearts. Further studies are needed to better characterize those disparities and elucidate the role of denervation, immunosuppressive regimens, and inter-species molecule/receptor interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370155
Primary Topic
Xenotransplantation and immune response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370155: Comparison of baseline EKG parameters between the first and second Heart xenotransplant

David Ayares, Manjula Ananthram, Andrew Tully, Richard Amara et al.
Circulation
Xenotransplantation and immune response
article

Abstract 4370155: Comparison of baseline EKG parameters between the first and second Heart xenotransplant

David Ayares, Manjula Ananthram, Andrew Tully, Richard Amara, Timm Dickfeld, Alison Grazioli, Muhammad Mohiuddin, Justin Brilliant, Bartley P. Griffith, Javier Galindo, Avneesh K. Singh, Oneib Khan, Susie Hong-Zohlman, Mahdokht Parsirad, Ubaid Khan, Stephen R. Shorofsky, Erika Feller
article en

Abstract

Background: The 1 st and 2 nd genetically modified porcine-to-human cardiac xenotransplantations were performed at the University of Maryland in January 2022 and September 2023, respectively. The recipients survived for 60 and 41 days, respectively. Methods: Daily 12-lead EKGs were obtained during the postoperative days (POD). Standard baseline parameters were analyzed from non-paced EKGs. Results: The average heart rate (HR) was similar between the 1 st and 2 nd xenotransplant with a HR difference of 1.9±3.0 (75.0±10.0bpm vs 73.1±16.7bpm, P=0.13) with no significant differences in HR over POD 1-20 (79.0±12.0bpm vs 78.15±8.5bpm, P=0.33) or POD 21-40 (70.0±7.0bpm vs 69.9±19.8bpm, P=0.34; Figure 1A). The average PR interval was significantly longer in the 1 st xenotransplant compared to the 2 nd, with a difference of 55.2±6.2ms (212.0±20.0ms vs 156.8±32.5ms, P<0.001). This was consistent during POD 1-20 (200.0±15.0ms vs 145.0±28.4.0ms, P<0.001) and POD 21-40 (228.0±18.0ms vs 171.7±32.0ms, P<0.001; Figure 1B). QRS width (ventricular depolarization) was significantly longer in the 1 st xenotransplant compared to the 2 nd, with a difference of 64.6±3.6ms (145.0±16.0ms vs 80.4±17.7ms, P<0.001). This was seen during POD 1-20 (154.0±19.0ms vs 82.5±15.5ms, P<0.001) as well as POD 21-40 (151.0±14.0ms vs 78.6±20.4, P<0.001; Figure 1C). Similarly, the QT interval (ventricular repolarization) was significantly longer in the 1 st xenotransplant compared to the 2 nd, with a difference of 132.1±9.7 (509.0±51.0ms vs 376.9±42.4ms, P<0.001). The longer QT interval was seen during POD 1-20 (504.0±57.0ms vs 377.75±43.0ms, P<0.001) and POD 21-40 (502.0±56.0ms vs 373.1±42.8ms, P<0.001; Figure 1D). Accordingly, the QTc interval was longer in the 1 st xenotransplant with a difference of 158.2 ± 11.7ms (568.0±55.0ms vs 409.8±55.6ms, P<0.001), which was consistent during POD 1- 20 (591.0±52.0ms vs 429.8±53.0ms, P<0.001) and POD 21-40 (141.5±16.2 (535.0±51.0ms vs 393.4±45.9ms, P<0.001; Figure 1E). Conclusion: Significant differences in AV nodal conduction, ventricular depolarization and repolarization timings were seen between the 1 st and 2 nd xenotransplanted patient with the latter more closely approximating the average ECG intervals seen in porcine hearts. Further studies are needed to better characterize those disparities and elucidate the role of denervation, immunosuppressive regimens, and inter-species molecule/receptor interactions.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Virginia Tech (US), MedStar Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Xenotransplantation and immune response
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.