Abstract 4371442: Aspirin Shows Comparable Efficacy to Other Antithrombotic Strategies in Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Patients with Aortic Arch Atheroma: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Atherosclerotic plaques ≥4 mm in the aortic arch are strongly associated with recurrent stroke, particularly in cases of undetermined etiology. Guidelines such as the 2021 Stroke Guideline highlight the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the optimal antithrombotic strategy in this patient population. Objective: To compare the efficacy of antithrombotic therapies in preventing recurrent stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and aortic arch atheroma ≥4 mm. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases through April 2025. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), rivaroxaban, warfarin, or ticagrelor in patients with stroke/TIA and evidence of aortic arch plaques were included. It was hypothesized that alternative therapies would offer superior protection against recurrent stroke. Results: Four studies (three randomized trials and one observational study) totaling 4,399 patients were included. Most patients had ischemic stroke or TIA, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and were smokers. No statistically significant superiority was observed for alternatives over aspirin: warfarin (RR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.72–1.58; p=0.75), ticagrelor (RR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.68–1.18; p=0.43), rivaroxaban (RR 1.19; 95% CI: 0.89–1.61; p=0.24), and warfarin versus antiplatelets (RR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.72–1.48; p=0.87). Conclusion: The analyzed therapies did not demonstrate clinical superiority over aspirin in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with aortic arch atheroma. Aspirin monotherapy remains the most consistent approach; however, further studies are needed to inform clinical decisions in this subgroup. Artificial intelligence tools were used under human supervision to assist in adapting the abstract to the American Heart Association submission format.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371442
Primary Topic
Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371442: Aspirin Shows Comparable Efficacy to Other Antithrombotic Strategies in Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Patients with Aortic Arch Atheroma: A Systematic Review

Antoinette Oliveira Blackman, G. Oliveira
Circulation
Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
article

Abstract 4371442: Aspirin Shows Comparable Efficacy to Other Antithrombotic Strategies in Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Patients with Aortic Arch Atheroma: A Systematic Review

Antoinette Oliveira Blackman, G. Oliveira
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Atherosclerotic plaques ≥4 mm in the aortic arch are strongly associated with recurrent stroke, particularly in cases of undetermined etiology. Guidelines such as the 2021 Stroke Guideline highlight the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the optimal antithrombotic strategy in this patient population. Objective: To compare the efficacy of antithrombotic therapies in preventing recurrent stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and aortic arch atheroma ≥4 mm. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases through April 2025. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies comparing aspirin, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), rivaroxaban, warfarin, or ticagrelor in patients with stroke/TIA and evidence of aortic arch plaques were included. It was hypothesized that alternative therapies would offer superior protection against recurrent stroke. Results: Four studies (three randomized trials and one observational study) totaling 4,399 patients were included. Most patients had ischemic stroke or TIA, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and were smokers. No statistically significant superiority was observed for alternatives over aspirin: warfarin (RR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.72–1.58; p=0.75), ticagrelor (RR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.68–1.18; p=0.43), rivaroxaban (RR 1.19; 95% CI: 0.89–1.61; p=0.24), and warfarin versus antiplatelets (RR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.72–1.48; p=0.87). Conclusion: The analyzed therapies did not demonstrate clinical superiority over aspirin in preventing recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with aortic arch atheroma. Aspirin monotherapy remains the most consistent approach; however, further studies are needed to inform clinical decisions in this subgroup. Artificial intelligence tools were used under human supervision to assist in adapting the abstract to the American Heart Association submission format.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Centro Universitário Euroamericano (BR), University Center of Brasília (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Aortic Thrombus and Embolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.