Abstract 4373218: Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-Intensity Statin Plus Ezetimibe versus High-Intensity Statin in Older Adult Patients: A Meta-analysis

Introduction: Guidelines recommend high-intensity statin treatment for achieving target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in high-risk patients. Nonetheless, moderate-intensity statin use has been suggested as an alternative in older adult patients due to concerns about adverse effects. Whether a combination approach of a moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe is superior to high-intensity statins in older adult patients for hypercholesterolemia is unknown. Objective: We performed a meta-analysis comparing the combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in older adult patients (≥65 years) with hypercholesterolemia. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception through May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin in older adults. Outcomes of interest were reduction in LDL-C levels (LDL-C <70 mg/dL or ≥50% reduction in LDL-C), muscle-related adverse effects, new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM), death, and treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse effects. Frequentist random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Four RCTs with 2453 patients (moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe: 1218, 49.6%) were included. The rate of reduction in LDL-C levels (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.04-1.38; p=0.011; I 2 =67.2%) was higher with the combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe compared with high-intensity statin. Muscle-related adverse effects (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.60; p=0.004; I 2 =0%) and new-onset DM (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.86; p=0.008; I 2 =0%) were lower with moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe compared with high-intensity statin. Death and treatment discontinuation were similar between the groups. Conclusion: In older adult patients, combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe demonstrated superior LDL-C reduction and a more favorable safety profile, with lower rates of muscle-related adverse effects and new-onset DM compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy. Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe is a viable treatment option for older adult patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4373218
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4373218: Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-Intensity Statin Plus Ezetimibe versus High-Intensity Statin in Older Adult Patients: A Meta-analysis

Shelby Kutty, Mrinal Murali Krishna, Zafer Akman, Michael G. Nanna et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4373218: Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-Intensity Statin Plus Ezetimibe versus High-Intensity Statin in Older Adult Patients: A Meta-analysis

Shelby Kutty, Mrinal Murali Krishna, Zafer Akman, Michael G. Nanna, Andrew M. Goldsweig, Abdulla A. Damluji, Meghna Joseph, Raiza Rossi, Chidubem Ezenna, Kuan Yu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Guidelines recommend high-intensity statin treatment for achieving target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in high-risk patients. Nonetheless, moderate-intensity statin use has been suggested as an alternative in older adult patients due to concerns about adverse effects. Whether a combination approach of a moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe is superior to high-intensity statins in older adult patients for hypercholesterolemia is unknown. Objective: We performed a meta-analysis comparing the combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in older adult patients (≥65 years) with hypercholesterolemia. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception through May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin in older adults. Outcomes of interest were reduction in LDL-C levels (LDL-C <70 mg/dL or ≥50% reduction in LDL-C), muscle-related adverse effects, new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM), death, and treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse effects. Frequentist random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Four RCTs with 2453 patients (moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe: 1218, 49.6%) were included. The rate of reduction in LDL-C levels (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.04-1.38; p=0.011; I 2 =67.2%) was higher with the combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe compared with high-intensity statin. Muscle-related adverse effects (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.60; p=0.004; I 2 =0%) and new-onset DM (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.86; p=0.008; I 2 =0%) were lower with moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe compared with high-intensity statin. Death and treatment discontinuation were similar between the groups. Conclusion: In older adult patients, combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe demonstrated superior LDL-C reduction and a more favorable safety profile, with lower rates of muscle-related adverse effects and new-onset DM compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy. Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe is a viable treatment option for older adult patients with hypercholesterolemia.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Baystate Medical Center (US), Jacobi Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), BayCare Health System (US), Baystate Health (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.