Abstract 4345167: A Contemporary Machine Learning-Based Risk Stratification for Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Multimodal Real-World Data

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous condition with high morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification of patients with HFpEF is important for advancing therapeutic development and improving clinical care. Research Question: Predicting overall mortality and heart failure (HF) Hospitalization in real world HFpEF population Aims : to leverage machine learning model to develop prognostic models based on real-world data, with the potential to support risk stratification in routine clinical practice Methods: CONFIDENT is an observational, multi-cohort study across three centers in Europe and the US. Patients with HFpEF, according to the HFA-PEFF criteria with ≥ 2 years of follow-up, were included from 2013 to 2022. The dataset included multimodal data from electronic health records, lab tests, echocardiography, and electrocardiography, with 82 baseline candidate variables. We developed machine learning-based prognostic models to predict all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Model performance was compared to conventional risk score in an external validation cohort. Results: A total of 1208 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 72±12. The 2-year risk of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality ranged from 13 to 44% and 9 to 19% respectively. The all-cause mortality prognostic model achieved good discrimination with a C-index of 0.67 [95%CI, 0.66-0.68], and 0.68 [95%CI 0.66-0.69] in the training cohorts, and 0.72 [95%CI 0.65-0.78] in the validation cohort, and performed better than the PREDICT-HFpEF score (C-index: 0.66 [95%CI 0.65-0.68], p-value =0.012; 0.60, [95%CI 0.59-0.62],p-value < 0.01 and 0.67 [95%CI 0.58-0.73], p-value =0.013 respectively. Similar results were observed when compared to the Meta-Analysis Global Group In Chronic Heart Failure Risk Score (MAGGIC). Similarly, the model derived for HF hospitalization outperformed PREDICT-HFpEF and MAGGIC + natriuretic peptide. Conclusion: CONFIDENT prognostic models for all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization using routinely collected variables can reliably predict outcomes and facilitate personalized care and trial recruitment strategies in HFpEF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4345167
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4345167: A Contemporary Machine Learning-Based Risk Stratification for Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Multimodal Real-World Data

Tobias Zehnder, Suresh Balu, Manesh R. Patel, Iva Mayer et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4345167: A Contemporary Machine Learning-Based Risk Stratification for Mortality and Hospitalization in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Multimodal Real-World Data

Tobias Zehnder, Suresh Balu, Manesh R. Patel, Iva Mayer, Maxime Touzot, Javed Butler, Jerremy Weerts, Félix Balazard, Mohammad Hallal, Aruna D. Pradhan, Bradley J. Hintze, Marzia Rigolli, Vanessa P. M. van Empel, Ciro Esposito, Benoît Sauty, Mariann Micsinai Balan, Nicolas Loiseau, Marat Fudim, Francisco Torres, Paul Kessler, Lars Lund
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous condition with high morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification of patients with HFpEF is important for advancing therapeutic development and improving clinical care. Research Question: Predicting overall mortality and heart failure (HF) Hospitalization in real world HFpEF population Aims : to leverage machine learning model to develop prognostic models based on real-world data, with the potential to support risk stratification in routine clinical practice Methods: CONFIDENT is an observational, multi-cohort study across three centers in Europe and the US. Patients with HFpEF, according to the HFA-PEFF criteria with ≥ 2 years of follow-up, were included from 2013 to 2022. The dataset included multimodal data from electronic health records, lab tests, echocardiography, and electrocardiography, with 82 baseline candidate variables. We developed machine learning-based prognostic models to predict all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Model performance was compared to conventional risk score in an external validation cohort. Results: A total of 1208 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 72±12. The 2-year risk of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality ranged from 13 to 44% and 9 to 19% respectively. The all-cause mortality prognostic model achieved good discrimination with a C-index of 0.67 [95%CI, 0.66-0.68], and 0.68 [95%CI 0.66-0.69] in the training cohorts, and 0.72 [95%CI 0.65-0.78] in the validation cohort, and performed better than the PREDICT-HFpEF score (C-index: 0.66 [95%CI 0.65-0.68], p-value =0.012; 0.60, [95%CI 0.59-0.62],p-value < 0.01 and 0.67 [95%CI 0.58-0.73], p-value =0.013 respectively. Similar results were observed when compared to the Meta-Analysis Global Group In Chronic Heart Failure Risk Score (MAGGIC). Similarly, the model derived for HF hospitalization outperformed PREDICT-HFpEF and MAGGIC + natriuretic peptide. Conclusion: CONFIDENT prognostic models for all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization using routinely collected variables can reliably predict outcomes and facilitate personalized care and trial recruitment strategies in HFpEF.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) (DE), Duke University (US), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Clinical Research Institute (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US), Karolinska Development (Sweden) (SE), Duke Medical Center (US), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Sweden) (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.