Abstract 4370165: Prenatal Care and Perinatal Regionalization of Congenital Heart Defect Care

Background: Regionalization is the direction of patients to centers with appropriate levels of care and is key to optimizing outcomes. However, the role of prenatal care in perinatal regionalization for congenital heart defect (CHD) care is poorly understood. Objective: To estimate associations between prenatal care initiation or visit frequency, and probability of delivery at a pediatric cardiac center. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of neonates with CHDs in Illinois, 2013-2021. Data were obtained from the Illinois Department of Public Health’s Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Reporting System. The two exposure variables were: (1) prenatal care initiation – none vs. inadequate prenatal care (initiated after the fourth month or <50% of recommended visits); and (2) prenatal visit frequency – intermediate (50-79% of recommended visits) vs. adequate (80-109%) or adequate plus ( > 110%) prenatal care. The outcome was delivery at a pediatric cardiac surgical center. Multivariable linear probability models estimating associations between both prenatal care exposures and delivery hospital, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, were stratified by CHD severity (mild, moderate, severe) to account for the modifying effect of CHD severity. Results: Of 12,113 neonates with CHD, 25.4% were born at a cardiac center; 2.3% had no prenatal care, 13.4% had inadequate prenatal care, 10.8% had intermediate prenatal care, and 73.6% had adequate or adequate plus prenatal care; 13.0% had severe CHD and 73.0% had mild CHD. In multivariable models, prenatal care initiation was associated with a 10.5 percentage-point (pp) higher probability of delivery at a cardiac center for those with fetuses who had mild CHD (95%CI 4.7-16.2pp) and 30.2pp higher probability for severe CHD (95%CI 13.6-46.9pp). For mild CHD, adequate plus prenatal care was associated with a 6.7 pp (95%CI 4.0 to -9.4pp) lower probability of delivery at a cardiac center than intermediate prenatal care. Prenatal visit frequency was not associated with delivery at a cardiac center for severe CHD ( Table 1 ). Conclusion: Initiating prenatal care, even if delayed, is associated with a higher probability of delivery at a cardiac center, especially for severe CHDs. However, more prenatal visits may direct mild CHDs to non-cardiac centers. Both prenatal care components are crucial to achieve efficient perinatal regionalization of CHD care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370165
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370165: Prenatal Care and Perinatal Regionalization of Congenital Heart Defect Care

Beau Batton, Christina Laternser, Cecilia A. Albaro, Brett R. Anderson et al.
Circulation
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Abstract 4370165: Prenatal Care and Perinatal Regionalization of Congenital Heart Defect Care

Beau Batton, Christina Laternser, Cecilia A. Albaro, Brett R. Anderson, Joyce Woo, Lynn M. Yee, William A. Grobman
article en

Abstract

Background: Regionalization is the direction of patients to centers with appropriate levels of care and is key to optimizing outcomes. However, the role of prenatal care in perinatal regionalization for congenital heart defect (CHD) care is poorly understood. Objective: To estimate associations between prenatal care initiation or visit frequency, and probability of delivery at a pediatric cardiac center. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of neonates with CHDs in Illinois, 2013-2021. Data were obtained from the Illinois Department of Public Health’s Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Reporting System. The two exposure variables were: (1) prenatal care initiation – none vs. inadequate prenatal care (initiated after the fourth month or <50% of recommended visits); and (2) prenatal visit frequency – intermediate (50-79% of recommended visits) vs. adequate (80-109%) or adequate plus ( > 110%) prenatal care. The outcome was delivery at a pediatric cardiac surgical center. Multivariable linear probability models estimating associations between both prenatal care exposures and delivery hospital, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics, were stratified by CHD severity (mild, moderate, severe) to account for the modifying effect of CHD severity. Results: Of 12,113 neonates with CHD, 25.4% were born at a cardiac center; 2.3% had no prenatal care, 13.4% had inadequate prenatal care, 10.8% had intermediate prenatal care, and 73.6% had adequate or adequate plus prenatal care; 13.0% had severe CHD and 73.0% had mild CHD. In multivariable models, prenatal care initiation was associated with a 10.5 percentage-point (pp) higher probability of delivery at a cardiac center for those with fetuses who had mild CHD (95%CI 4.7-16.2pp) and 30.2pp higher probability for severe CHD (95%CI 13.6-46.9pp). For mild CHD, adequate plus prenatal care was associated with a 6.7 pp (95%CI 4.0 to -9.4pp) lower probability of delivery at a cardiac center than intermediate prenatal care. Prenatal visit frequency was not associated with delivery at a cardiac center for severe CHD ( Table 1 ). Conclusion: Initiating prenatal care, even if delayed, is associated with a higher probability of delivery at a cardiac center, especially for severe CHDs. However, more prenatal visits may direct mild CHDs to non-cardiac centers. Both prenatal care components are crucial to achieve efficient perinatal regionalization of CHD care.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (US), Brown University (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System (US), Northwestern Medicine (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.