Abstract 4366960: Interhospital Transfer versus Direct Admission for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Timely reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, whether interhospital transfer delays impact clinical outcomes compared with direct admission remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing interhospital transfer versus direct admission for primary PCI in STEMI patients. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included post-discharge mortality (30 days, 6 months, 12 months), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stroke, bleeding, target vessel revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and reperfusion time metrics. Results: Sixteen studies (n = 165,084) were included, comprising ten retrospective cohorts and six prospective cohorts. In-hospital mortality was lower in the transfer group (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69–0.96) with absolute risk reduction is 7 fewer per 1000, while 6-month post-discharge mortality was lower in the direct admission group (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.25–1.43) and the absolute risk is 14 more deaths per 1000 in the transfer group. No significant differences were found in MACE, stroke, bleeding, heart failure hospitalization, or total all-cause death. Transferred patients had a slightly lower LVEF (mean difference −1.57%; 95% CI, −2.58 to −0.57). Direct admission was associated with shorter symptom-to-balloon and total ischemic times, while door-to-balloon time was slightly shorter in transferred patients. Conclusion: In STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, interhospital transfer was not associated with worse clinical outcomes despite longer delays to reperfusion. These findings highlight the critical role of coordinated STEMI networks in mitigating time-dependent risk and delivering equitable care across pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366960
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366960: Interhospital Transfer versus Direct Admission for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abdalhakim R. M. Shubietah, M. Ayaz Ahmad, Nadeem Khayat, Mohammad Bdair et al.
Circulation
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Abstract 4366960: Interhospital Transfer versus Direct Admission for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abdalhakim R. M. Shubietah, M. Ayaz Ahmad, Nadeem Khayat, Mohammad Bdair, S. I. AMER, Fathi Milhem, Mohamed S. Elgendy, Anwar Zahran, Firas Besharieh, Orabi Hajjeh, Mohammedsadeq A. Shweliya, Khadeeja Ali Hamzah
article en

Abstract

Background: Timely reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, whether interhospital transfer delays impact clinical outcomes compared with direct admission remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing interhospital transfer versus direct admission for primary PCI in STEMI patients. Searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included post-discharge mortality (30 days, 6 months, 12 months), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stroke, bleeding, target vessel revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and reperfusion time metrics. Results: Sixteen studies (n = 165,084) were included, comprising ten retrospective cohorts and six prospective cohorts. In-hospital mortality was lower in the transfer group (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69–0.96) with absolute risk reduction is 7 fewer per 1000, while 6-month post-discharge mortality was lower in the direct admission group (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.25–1.43) and the absolute risk is 14 more deaths per 1000 in the transfer group. No significant differences were found in MACE, stroke, bleeding, heart failure hospitalization, or total all-cause death. Transferred patients had a slightly lower LVEF (mean difference −1.57%; 95% CI, −2.58 to −0.57). Direct admission was associated with shorter symptom-to-balloon and total ischemic times, while door-to-balloon time was slightly shorter in transferred patients. Conclusion: In STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, interhospital transfer was not associated with worse clinical outcomes despite longer delays to reperfusion. These findings highlight the critical role of coordinated STEMI networks in mitigating time-dependent risk and delivering equitable care across pathways.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Baghdad (IQ), An-Najah National University (PS), Tanta University (EG), Hurley Medical Center (US), Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.