Abstract 4371471: Speech-Based Smartphone App Improves Adherence to Remote Monitoring in Rural Heart Failure Patients

Background: Heart failure is a major driver of hospitalizations and readmissions in older adults. Remote patient monitoring (RPM), including tracking blood pressure, weight, heart rate, and symptoms through questionnaires and care coordination, facilitates early detection of heart failure decompensation. However, patient engagement with these tools remains limited, particularly in rural settings. The Cordio HearO app, approved in the EU and under clinical evaluation in the US, uses daily voice recordings to detect early fluid retention through speech analysis, directing clinicians to remotely monitor heart failure patients at risk for hospitalization due to impending decompensation, while also supporting ongoing patient engagement. Research Question: How does adherence and usability differ between Cordio HearO and standard RPM in rural heart failure patients? Methods: Adherence was evaluated in a single center cohort of HF patients using Cordio HearO (N=21) and a control group using standard RPM monitoring (N=96). Adherence was defined as the percentage of days with submitted vital signs at 91 and 182 days. Welch’s t-tests were used to account for unequal sample sizes, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Usability was assessed in a separate cohort (Cordio: N=11, Control: N=16) using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = extremely difficult, 5 = extremely easy). Group differences were analyzed using an independent t-test assuming unequal variances. Results: At 91 days, Cordio users had a mean adherence of 88% (95% CI: 83.6%–92.4%), significantly higher than controls at 63% (95% CI: 61.0%–65.0%) (t = 10.17, p < 0.000001). At 182 days, adherence further improved among Cordio users to 93% (95% CI: 89.5%–96.5%), while adherence declined in the control group to 56% (95% CI: 53.9%–58.1%) (t = 15.05, p < 0.000001). Perceived ease-of-use scores were also higher in the Cordio group (mean = 5.00, SD = 0.00) compared to controls (mean = 4.31, SD = 1.01), with all Cordio users rating the system as “extremely easy” (t(25) = -2.71, p = 0.0161). Conclusion: Preliminary analysis of the Cordio HearO app demonstrated significantly higher adherence and usability among heart failure patients compared to traditional RPM approaches. These findings support the utility of speech-based digital tools to enhance long-term engagement and remote care delivery, particularly in rural settings where daily monitoring is key to reducing hospitalizations and improving outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371471
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371471: Speech-Based Smartphone App Improves Adherence to Remote Monitoring in Rural Heart Failure Patients

William J. Abraham, Samuel D. Miller, Ronit Haviv, Nicolas Chronos et al.
Circulation
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Abstract 4371471: Speech-Based Smartphone App Improves Adherence to Remote Monitoring in Rural Heart Failure Patients

William J. Abraham, Samuel D. Miller, Ronit Haviv, Nicolas Chronos, Jered Miller, Moran Elpaz Mezan
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart failure is a major driver of hospitalizations and readmissions in older adults. Remote patient monitoring (RPM), including tracking blood pressure, weight, heart rate, and symptoms through questionnaires and care coordination, facilitates early detection of heart failure decompensation. However, patient engagement with these tools remains limited, particularly in rural settings. The Cordio HearO app, approved in the EU and under clinical evaluation in the US, uses daily voice recordings to detect early fluid retention through speech analysis, directing clinicians to remotely monitor heart failure patients at risk for hospitalization due to impending decompensation, while also supporting ongoing patient engagement. Research Question: How does adherence and usability differ between Cordio HearO and standard RPM in rural heart failure patients? Methods: Adherence was evaluated in a single center cohort of HF patients using Cordio HearO (N=21) and a control group using standard RPM monitoring (N=96). Adherence was defined as the percentage of days with submitted vital signs at 91 and 182 days. Welch’s t-tests were used to account for unequal sample sizes, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Usability was assessed in a separate cohort (Cordio: N=11, Control: N=16) using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = extremely difficult, 5 = extremely easy). Group differences were analyzed using an independent t-test assuming unequal variances. Results: At 91 days, Cordio users had a mean adherence of 88% (95% CI: 83.6%–92.4%), significantly higher than controls at 63% (95% CI: 61.0%–65.0%) (t = 10.17, p < 0.000001). At 182 days, adherence further improved among Cordio users to 93% (95% CI: 89.5%–96.5%), while adherence declined in the control group to 56% (95% CI: 53.9%–58.1%) (t = 15.05, p < 0.000001). Perceived ease-of-use scores were also higher in the Cordio group (mean = 5.00, SD = 0.00) compared to controls (mean = 4.31, SD = 1.01), with all Cordio users rating the system as “extremely easy” (t(25) = -2.71, p = 0.0161). Conclusion: Preliminary analysis of the Cordio HearO app demonstrated significantly higher adherence and usability among heart failure patients compared to traditional RPM approaches. These findings support the utility of speech-based digital tools to enhance long-term engagement and remote care delivery, particularly in rural settings where daily monitoring is key to reducing hospitalizations and improving outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Rush University Medical Center (US), Eaton (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.