Abstract 4369184: Social Vulnerability and Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: Deprivation indices are composite scores that capture regional variation in social determinants of health (SDH) and have been independently linked to healthcare disparities. The social vulnerability index (SVI) is unique among these indices as it can be split into four unique themes for granular analysis. The purpose of this study is to assess whether SVI and SVI theme are independently associated with in-hospital outcomes and discharge prescription patterns of adults admitted to the hospital with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: This study included participants aged ≥18 years old hospitalized for HFrEF and eligible for guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) in the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) quality improvement (QI) program between June 5, 2013 and January 4, 2024. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, GDMT at discharge, and length of stay. Hierarchical multivariable regression models with clustering by facility were used: (1) with SVI / SVI theme as the predictor, (2) partial adjustment for demographics, and (3) full adjustment for demographics and medical comorbidities. Results: Among 186,928 patients with HFrEF without contraindication to any GDMT, 30,733 (16.4%) were from the lowest SVI quartile (least vulnerable) and 58,108 (31.1%) were from the highest SVI quartile (most vulnerable). Presented odds ratios (ORs) compare highest vs lowest SVI quartile. In-hospital mortality ORs decreased with increased SVI (unadjusted OR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.84), but were not statistically significant in fully adjusted models. GDMT rates at discharge were higher with higher SVI (unadjusted OR for ACE/ARB/ARNI: 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.18; for beta blocker: 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19; for MRA: 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16; for SGLT2i: 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13), but were not statistically significant in fully adjusted models. Length of stay was significantly longer with higher SVI, including after adjustment (fully adjusted OR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02). Replacing SVI with each SVI theme yielded similar results. Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized for HFrEF at GWTG-HF hospitals, regional vulnerability defined by SVI was not associated with in-hospital mortality or GDMT at discharge after adjustment for individual demographics and medical comorbidities. Findings suggest that participation in QI programs such as GWTG-HF may help reduce the influence of regional SDH on care quality and in-hospital outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369184
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369184: Social Vulnerability and Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Nicholas K. Brownell, Moira Inkelas, Alexandra M. Klomhaus, Clyde W. Yancy et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4369184: Social Vulnerability and Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Nicholas K. Brownell, Moira Inkelas, Alexandra M. Klomhaus, Clyde W. Yancy, Gregg C. Fonarow, Boback Ziaeian, Sabra C. Lewsey
article en

Abstract

Background: Deprivation indices are composite scores that capture regional variation in social determinants of health (SDH) and have been independently linked to healthcare disparities. The social vulnerability index (SVI) is unique among these indices as it can be split into four unique themes for granular analysis. The purpose of this study is to assess whether SVI and SVI theme are independently associated with in-hospital outcomes and discharge prescription patterns of adults admitted to the hospital with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: This study included participants aged ≥18 years old hospitalized for HFrEF and eligible for guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) in the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) quality improvement (QI) program between June 5, 2013 and January 4, 2024. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, GDMT at discharge, and length of stay. Hierarchical multivariable regression models with clustering by facility were used: (1) with SVI / SVI theme as the predictor, (2) partial adjustment for demographics, and (3) full adjustment for demographics and medical comorbidities. Results: Among 186,928 patients with HFrEF without contraindication to any GDMT, 30,733 (16.4%) were from the lowest SVI quartile (least vulnerable) and 58,108 (31.1%) were from the highest SVI quartile (most vulnerable). Presented odds ratios (ORs) compare highest vs lowest SVI quartile. In-hospital mortality ORs decreased with increased SVI (unadjusted OR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.84), but were not statistically significant in fully adjusted models. GDMT rates at discharge were higher with higher SVI (unadjusted OR for ACE/ARB/ARNI: 1.14, 95% CI 1.11-1.18; for beta blocker: 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19; for MRA: 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16; for SGLT2i: 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13), but were not statistically significant in fully adjusted models. Length of stay was significantly longer with higher SVI, including after adjustment (fully adjusted OR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02). Replacing SVI with each SVI theme yielded similar results. Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized for HFrEF at GWTG-HF hospitals, regional vulnerability defined by SVI was not associated with in-hospital mortality or GDMT at discharge after adjustment for individual demographics and medical comorbidities. Findings suggest that participation in QI programs such as GWTG-HF may help reduce the influence of regional SDH on care quality and in-hospital outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Northwestern University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), UCLA Health (US), UCLA Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.