Abstract 4371491: <i>Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Surgical Intervention in a Multidisciplinary Lymphedema Program: A Vascular Medicine Perspective</i>

Introduction: Lymphedema is increasingly recognized as a condition best served within multidisciplinary care models. Identifying patient characteristics associated with surgical compared to medical management may help streamline care. Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with surgical intervention among patients evaluated at a multidisciplinary lymphatic center. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting for lymphedema evaluation at the BIDMC Lymphatic Center between January 2018 and December 2023. The BIDMC Lymphatic Center includes members of cardiovascular medicine, radiology, plastic surgery, and physical/occupational therapy. Our dependent variable was surgical intervention and independent variables included demographics, comorbid conditions, and geospatial data. Variables with significant associations in adjusted analyses were included in the multivariate logistic regression model using SPSS™. Home ZIP codes were translated into latitude and longitude coordinates using R™ and plotted to create a spatial distribution map relative to the BIDMC Lymphatic Center using Python™ (Figure 1) with open-source geospatial libraries (GeoPandas, Matplotlib, Contextily). Results: A total of 2,031 participants were included in the initial cohort, of whom 1,312 (65%) were identified as having lymphedema at their initial vascular medicine visit. Overall, 354 patients (17.4% of the total cohort) were referred for surgical evaluation and 146 (7%) ultimately underwent surgical intervention. Among patients with lymphedema (N=1,312), increasing age (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 – 0.99) and higher BMI (aOR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.92 – 0.97) were independently associated with lower odds of undergoing surgery. Residence within Massachusetts was also associated with lower odds of surgery (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61), while a history of malignancy increased the odds of surgical intervention (aOR 2.20 95% CI 1.41 – 3.44). Gender, a history of chronic venous disease, and etiology of lymphedema (primary vs secondary) were not significantly associated with surgical intervention after adjustment. Conclusions: Patient characteristics associated with lymphatic surgery in a multidisciplinary lymphatic center include those with secondary lymphedema from malignancy, younger age, and lower BMI. Additionally, patients traveling from afar are more likely to receive surgery, demonstrating the lack of access to lymphatic surgical centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371491
Primary Topic
Lymphatic System and Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371491: Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Surgical Intervention in a Multidisciplinary Lymphedema Program: A Vascular Medicine Perspective

Dhruv K Singhal, Brett Carroll, Firas Hentati, Alexandra Medline et al.
Circulation
Lymphatic System and Diseases
article

Abstract 4371491: Clinical and Demographic Predictors of Surgical Intervention in a Multidisciplinary Lymphedema Program: A Vascular Medicine Perspective

Dhruv K Singhal, Brett Carroll, Firas Hentati, Alexandra Medline, Prabhu Sasankan, Anthony Pettinato, Sakshi Wadhwa
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Lymphedema is increasingly recognized as a condition best served within multidisciplinary care models. Identifying patient characteristics associated with surgical compared to medical management may help streamline care. Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with surgical intervention among patients evaluated at a multidisciplinary lymphatic center. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting for lymphedema evaluation at the BIDMC Lymphatic Center between January 2018 and December 2023. The BIDMC Lymphatic Center includes members of cardiovascular medicine, radiology, plastic surgery, and physical/occupational therapy. Our dependent variable was surgical intervention and independent variables included demographics, comorbid conditions, and geospatial data. Variables with significant associations in adjusted analyses were included in the multivariate logistic regression model using SPSS™. Home ZIP codes were translated into latitude and longitude coordinates using R™ and plotted to create a spatial distribution map relative to the BIDMC Lymphatic Center using Python™ (Figure 1) with open-source geospatial libraries (GeoPandas, Matplotlib, Contextily). Results: A total of 2,031 participants were included in the initial cohort, of whom 1,312 (65%) were identified as having lymphedema at their initial vascular medicine visit. Overall, 354 patients (17.4% of the total cohort) were referred for surgical evaluation and 146 (7%) ultimately underwent surgical intervention. Among patients with lymphedema (N=1,312), increasing age (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96 – 0.99) and higher BMI (aOR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.92 – 0.97) were independently associated with lower odds of undergoing surgery. Residence within Massachusetts was also associated with lower odds of surgery (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61), while a history of malignancy increased the odds of surgical intervention (aOR 2.20 95% CI 1.41 – 3.44). Gender, a history of chronic venous disease, and etiology of lymphedema (primary vs secondary) were not significantly associated with surgical intervention after adjustment. Conclusions: Patient characteristics associated with lymphatic surgery in a multidisciplinary lymphatic center include those with secondary lymphedema from malignancy, younger age, and lower BMI. Additionally, patients traveling from afar are more likely to receive surgery, demonstrating the lack of access to lymphatic surgical centers.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Lymphatic System and Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.