Abstract 4366977: High Catastrophic Spending Among Younger Patients with CVD or Related Risk Factors

Introduction/Background: Since 2010, there has been an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among younger adults aged 25-64 years. There is growing concern that financial barriers in accessing health care services may be contributing to these concerning trends, particularly among privately-insured adults with cardiometabolic risk factors and/or established cardiovascular disease, who face increasing copayments and deductibles. Understanding whether health expenditures and financial burden have worsened for those with CVD or related risk factors has important implications for both patients and policymakers. Research Question: This study aimed to understand how total health care costs, including patient-contributions to insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs for medical and prescription drug care, changed among adults aged 25 to 64 years with CVD (defined as coronary artery disease, angina pectoris, heart attack, or stroke) and/or related risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, peripheral artery disease, or transient ischemic attacks). In addition, we determined changes in the financial burden of health care (defined as health care expenditures divided by income) and catastrophic health spending (defined as spending over 10% of income on health expenditures). Methods: Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) public use files from 2007-2022, we fit survey-weighted regression models to evaluate changes in outcomes. National projections were estimated using survey weights. We estimated inflation-adjusted dollar values to 2022 US dollars. Results: Between 2007 and 2022, total health care expenditures for patients with CVD or risk factors increased from $4813 (95% CI: $4597, $5030) to $5304 (95% CI: $5030, $5577). This rise was largely driven by an increase in premiums ($3389 [$3196, 3582] to $3919 [$3698, $4141]), while out-of-pocket costs for medical care and prescription drugs were largely stable ($1424 [$1335, $1514] to $1384 [$1210, $1558]). While financial burden mildly decreased from 16.4% [15.5%, 17.4%] to 14.8% [13.8%, 15.8%] over this period, catastrophic health spending did not improve (34.6% [32.7%, 36.5%] to 34.2% [32.0%, 36.4%]). Conclusion: In this national study of younger adults with CVD or related risk factors, total health care costs increased, driven largely by a rise in insurance premiums. In addition, the burden of catastrophic health care spending remains high in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366977
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366977: High Catastrophic Spending Among Younger Patients with CVD or Related Risk Factors

Rishi K. Wadhera, Snehasini Dash, Jian Zu, ZhaoNian Zheng
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4366977: High Catastrophic Spending Among Younger Patients with CVD or Related Risk Factors

Rishi K. Wadhera, Snehasini Dash, Jian Zu, ZhaoNian Zheng
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Since 2010, there has been an increase in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality among younger adults aged 25-64 years. There is growing concern that financial barriers in accessing health care services may be contributing to these concerning trends, particularly among privately-insured adults with cardiometabolic risk factors and/or established cardiovascular disease, who face increasing copayments and deductibles. Understanding whether health expenditures and financial burden have worsened for those with CVD or related risk factors has important implications for both patients and policymakers. Research Question: This study aimed to understand how total health care costs, including patient-contributions to insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs for medical and prescription drug care, changed among adults aged 25 to 64 years with CVD (defined as coronary artery disease, angina pectoris, heart attack, or stroke) and/or related risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, peripheral artery disease, or transient ischemic attacks). In addition, we determined changes in the financial burden of health care (defined as health care expenditures divided by income) and catastrophic health spending (defined as spending over 10% of income on health expenditures). Methods: Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) public use files from 2007-2022, we fit survey-weighted regression models to evaluate changes in outcomes. National projections were estimated using survey weights. We estimated inflation-adjusted dollar values to 2022 US dollars. Results: Between 2007 and 2022, total health care expenditures for patients with CVD or risk factors increased from $4813 (95% CI: $4597, $5030) to $5304 (95% CI: $5030, $5577). This rise was largely driven by an increase in premiums ($3389 [$3196, 3582] to $3919 [$3698, $4141]), while out-of-pocket costs for medical care and prescription drugs were largely stable ($1424 [$1335, $1514] to $1384 [$1210, $1558]). While financial burden mildly decreased from 16.4% [15.5%, 17.4%] to 14.8% [13.8%, 15.8%] over this period, catastrophic health spending did not improve (34.6% [32.7%, 36.5%] to 34.2% [32.0%, 36.4%]). Conclusion: In this national study of younger adults with CVD or related risk factors, total health care costs increased, driven largely by a rise in insurance premiums. In addition, the burden of catastrophic health care spending remains high in this population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.