Abstract Sun1105: Trauma center vs. nearest non-trauma center: direct transport or bypass approach for out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest

Out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA), caused by severe injuries such as blunt or penetrating trauma, is associated with extremely low survival rates. Around 2.7% of trauma patients experience cardiac arrest on scene, with an overall survival rate below 5%. The impact of hospital level and transport distance on TCA outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether transport to hospitals of different levels and distances is associated with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to admission, and 30-day survival. We conducted a retrospective study of adult TCA patients transported to emergency departments in Taoyuan City from January 2016 to December 2022. Patients were divided into three groups: those transported to a trauma center (TC), to the nearest non-trauma center (non-TC), or cross-regionally to a TC. Geographic information system (GIS) data were used to determine hospital locations and distances. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze associations between transport destination and clinical outcomes. A total of 557 patients were included (TC: 190 [72 direct, 118 cross-regional]; non-TC: 367). The TC and cross-region TC groups had higher ROSC rates (30.6% and 30.5%, respectively) and lower mortality (95.8% for both) than the non-TC group (ROSC 12.0%, mortality 99.5%). Multivariable analysis showed that direct TC transport (aOR 2.91, 95% CI 1.54–5.49) and cross-regional TC transport (aOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.01–4.15) were significantly associated with better outcomes. Blunt trauma was independently associated with worse survival (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08–0.78). Transport to a TC—either directly or across regions—is associated with improved survival in TCA. The current policy prioritizing the nearest hospital may lead to worse outcomes. Within 10 km, bypassing non-TCs in favor of TCs may be beneficial. Blunt trauma is linked to poorer prognosis compared to other mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sun1105
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sun1105: Trauma center vs. nearest non-trauma center: direct transport or bypass approach for out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest

Chiang‐Ting Chien
Circulation
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Abstract Sun1105: Trauma center vs. nearest non-trauma center: direct transport or bypass approach for out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest

Chiang‐Ting Chien
article en

Abstract

Out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA), caused by severe injuries such as blunt or penetrating trauma, is associated with extremely low survival rates. Around 2.7% of trauma patients experience cardiac arrest on scene, with an overall survival rate below 5%. The impact of hospital level and transport distance on TCA outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether transport to hospitals of different levels and distances is associated with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to admission, and 30-day survival. We conducted a retrospective study of adult TCA patients transported to emergency departments in Taoyuan City from January 2016 to December 2022. Patients were divided into three groups: those transported to a trauma center (TC), to the nearest non-trauma center (non-TC), or cross-regionally to a TC. Geographic information system (GIS) data were used to determine hospital locations and distances. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze associations between transport destination and clinical outcomes. A total of 557 patients were included (TC: 190 [72 direct, 118 cross-regional]; non-TC: 367). The TC and cross-region TC groups had higher ROSC rates (30.6% and 30.5%, respectively) and lower mortality (95.8% for both) than the non-TC group (ROSC 12.0%, mortality 99.5%). Multivariable analysis showed that direct TC transport (aOR 2.91, 95% CI 1.54–5.49) and cross-regional TC transport (aOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.01–4.15) were significantly associated with better outcomes. Blunt trauma was independently associated with worse survival (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.08–0.78). Transport to a TC—either directly or across regions—is associated with improved survival in TCA. The current policy prioritizing the nearest hospital may lead to worse outcomes. Within 10 km, bypassing non-TCs in favor of TCs may be beneficial. Blunt trauma is linked to poorer prognosis compared to other mechanisms.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Ten Chen Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.