Abstract 4352302: Differential Pathophysiological Mechanism of Exercise Intolerance in Non-Obese Versus Obese Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: Diffuse myocardial fibrosis contributes to diastolic dysfunction and may impair exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, its impact on exercise intolerance in obese versus non-obese HFpEF phenotypes remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively identified 38 HFpEF patients (26 non-obese individuals [mean age 70 years, 13 female]; 12 obese patients [mean age 69 years, 8 female]) undergoing 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), including triple-slice T 1 mapping by modified look-locker inversion recovery sequence, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) between April 2013 and March 2025. The HFpEF diagnosis followed current consensus statements at various points during the study. Extracellular volume (ECV) was quantified, excluding infarcted segments. In a subgroup of patients, left ventricular (LV) chamber stiffness was also measured invasively by evaluating the LV end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship during preload manipulation. Results: The median interval between CMR and CPET was 22 days. There were no significant differences in CMR-ECV or exercise capacity between non-obese and obese patients (ECV: 32.0±3.2 vs. 32.8±3.9%, p=0.56; peak oxygen consumption: 19.3±5.7 vs. 17.3±5.7 ml/min/kg, p=0.32). Among non-obese individuals, ECV demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with peak oxygen consumption (r=-0.52, p=0.007), and this relationship remained significant after adjusting for age; however, it was not observed in obese patients (r=-0.06, p=0.84). In a subset of 11 non-obese patients, ECV showed a positive correlation with LV stiffness, as assessed by invasive pressure-volume curve analysis (r=0.67, p=0.048). Notably, non-obese patients with lower ECV (below the cohort median of 31.3%) exhibited relatively preserved exercise capacity, in contrast to non-obese individuals with higher ECV and obese patients, who demonstrated reduced functional capacity (peak oxygen consumption: 21.9 ± 4.8 vs. 16.3 ± 5.2, 17.5 ± 7.3, and 17.1 ± 4.2 ml/min/kg, respectively; ANOVA p = 0.06). Conclusions: This analysis revealed distinct pathophysiological mechanisms underlying exercise intolerance in non-obese versus obese HFpEF patients, underscoring the need for HFpEF phenotype-specific management strategies. In the non-obese group, ECV was a key factor of exercise intolerance, suggesting that fibrosis-targeting therapies may be a viable and potentially beneficial option for this subgroup.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4352302
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4352302: Differential Pathophysiological Mechanism of Exercise Intolerance in Non-Obese Versus Obese Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Masaki Ishida, Kaoru Dohi, Hajime Sakuma, Taku Omori et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4352302: Differential Pathophysiological Mechanism of Exercise Intolerance in Non-Obese Versus Obese Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Masaki Ishida, Kaoru Dohi, Hajime Sakuma, Taku Omori, Ryuji Okamoto, Emiyo Sugiura, Naoki Fujimoto, Shiro Nakamori, Keishi Moriwaki, K. Uno
article en

Abstract

Background: Diffuse myocardial fibrosis contributes to diastolic dysfunction and may impair exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, its impact on exercise intolerance in obese versus non-obese HFpEF phenotypes remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively identified 38 HFpEF patients (26 non-obese individuals [mean age 70 years, 13 female]; 12 obese patients [mean age 69 years, 8 female]) undergoing 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), including triple-slice T 1 mapping by modified look-locker inversion recovery sequence, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) between April 2013 and March 2025. The HFpEF diagnosis followed current consensus statements at various points during the study. Extracellular volume (ECV) was quantified, excluding infarcted segments. In a subgroup of patients, left ventricular (LV) chamber stiffness was also measured invasively by evaluating the LV end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship during preload manipulation. Results: The median interval between CMR and CPET was 22 days. There were no significant differences in CMR-ECV or exercise capacity between non-obese and obese patients (ECV: 32.0±3.2 vs. 32.8±3.9%, p=0.56; peak oxygen consumption: 19.3±5.7 vs. 17.3±5.7 ml/min/kg, p=0.32). Among non-obese individuals, ECV demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with peak oxygen consumption (r=-0.52, p=0.007), and this relationship remained significant after adjusting for age; however, it was not observed in obese patients (r=-0.06, p=0.84). In a subset of 11 non-obese patients, ECV showed a positive correlation with LV stiffness, as assessed by invasive pressure-volume curve analysis (r=0.67, p=0.048). Notably, non-obese patients with lower ECV (below the cohort median of 31.3%) exhibited relatively preserved exercise capacity, in contrast to non-obese individuals with higher ECV and obese patients, who demonstrated reduced functional capacity (peak oxygen consumption: 21.9 ± 4.8 vs. 16.3 ± 5.2, 17.5 ± 7.3, and 17.1 ± 4.2 ml/min/kg, respectively; ANOVA p = 0.06). Conclusions: This analysis revealed distinct pathophysiological mechanisms underlying exercise intolerance in non-obese versus obese HFpEF patients, underscoring the need for HFpEF phenotype-specific management strategies. In the non-obese group, ECV was a key factor of exercise intolerance, suggesting that fibrosis-targeting therapies may be a viable and potentially beneficial option for this subgroup.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Mie University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.