Abstract 4348297: Association Between Liberal Fluid Strategy and Postoperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis

Background: Fluid overload is increasingly recognized as a contributor to poor outcomes in critically ill patients, but its impact in the context of cardiac surgery remains underexplored. Objectives: To evaluate the association between fluid overload and key postoperative outcomes in adult cardiac surgery patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies comparing liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), hospital length of stay (H-LOS), ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS), postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU readmissions. Effect estimates were pooled using both frequentist random-effects models and Bayesian random-effects models with minimally informative, optimistic, and pessimistic priors. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251033118). Results: Seventeen studies comprising 13,530 patients were included. Compared to restrictive fluid strategies, liberal fluid management was associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.03–2.63; p = 0.04) and longer H-LOS (MD -1.02 days; 95% CI -1.67 to -0.37; p = 0.002). The Bayesian analysis confirmed a high probability of mortality reduction (>90%) and a likely reduction in AKI risk (posterior probability >99%) with restrictive fluid strategy. No significant differences were observed for ICU-LOS, POAF, mechanical ventilation duration, or ICU readmissions across most models, with Bayesian outputs indicating low to moderate probabilities of benefit in these outcomes. Conclusions: Liberal fluid strategy is associated with increased mortality, longer hospital stay, and higher risk of AKI in cardiac surgery patients. These findings highlight the potential harm of liberal fluid strategies and support the adoption of more restrictive fluid management approaches in perioperative cardiac care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4348297
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4348297: Association Between Liberal Fluid Strategy and Postoperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis

Luiz Alberto Bastos de Almeida, Rafael Melo, Vı́ctor Gómez, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro
Circulation
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Abstract 4348297: Association Between Liberal Fluid Strategy and Postoperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis

Luiz Alberto Bastos de Almeida, Rafael Melo, Vı́ctor Gómez, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro
article en

Abstract

Background: Fluid overload is increasingly recognized as a contributor to poor outcomes in critically ill patients, but its impact in the context of cardiac surgery remains underexplored. Objectives: To evaluate the association between fluid overload and key postoperative outcomes in adult cardiac surgery patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies comparing liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), hospital length of stay (H-LOS), ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS), postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU readmissions. Effect estimates were pooled using both frequentist random-effects models and Bayesian random-effects models with minimally informative, optimistic, and pessimistic priors. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251033118). Results: Seventeen studies comprising 13,530 patients were included. Compared to restrictive fluid strategies, liberal fluid management was associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.03–2.63; p = 0.04) and longer H-LOS (MD -1.02 days; 95% CI -1.67 to -0.37; p = 0.002). The Bayesian analysis confirmed a high probability of mortality reduction (>90%) and a likely reduction in AKI risk (posterior probability >99%) with restrictive fluid strategy. No significant differences were observed for ICU-LOS, POAF, mechanical ventilation duration, or ICU readmissions across most models, with Bayesian outputs indicating low to moderate probabilities of benefit in these outcomes. Conclusions: Liberal fluid strategy is associated with increased mortality, longer hospital stay, and higher risk of AKI in cardiac surgery patients. These findings highlight the potential harm of liberal fluid strategies and support the adoption of more restrictive fluid management approaches in perioperative cardiac care.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Auxilio Mutuo Hospital (PR), Centro Universitário Maurício de Nassau (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.