Abstract 4364344: Chronotropic Incompetence Predicts Reduced Survival and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data Across HFrEF and HFpEF

Background: Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is the inability of the heart to increase its rate adequately during activity. It is common in heart failure (HF) patients and is associated with poorer exercise capacity and clinical outcomes. This study systematically examines prognosis and functional outcomes in HF patients with and without CI. Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 8, 2025, comparing overall survival and exercise performance in HF patients with and without CI. All-cause mortality was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models based on reconstructed individual patient data. Exercise performance differences were analyzed as mean differences (MD) using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Subgroup and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analyses were also conducted. Results: A total of twenty-one studies were included. CI was associated with a 74% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.04; P < 0.001). Compared to patients without CI, those with CI had significantly lower exercise performance across all parameters: resting heart rate (MD: –6.91 bpm; P < 0.0001), peak heart rate (MD: –34.71 bpm; P < 0.001), heart rate reserve (MD: –28.05 bpm; P < 0.001), exercise duration (MD: –77.68 seconds; P = 0.021), peak workload (MD: –19.15 watts; P < 0.0001), and peak VO2 (MD: –3.31 ml.kg-1.min-1; P < 0.0001). Additionally, VE/VCO2 slope was significantly higher in the CI group (MD: 2.03; P < 0.0001), indicating poorer ventilatory efficiency. Subgroup analysis showed CI was linked to poor survival in both HF patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HR: 1.49 and 2.50, respectively). Additionally, RMST analysis revealed fewer event-free days over five years in patients with CI, with differences of 67 days in the HFrEF subgroup (P < 0.001) and 371 days in the HFpEF subgroup (P < 0.001), compared to their non-CI counterparts. Conclusion: HF patients with CI have poorer survival and reduced functional and ventilatory efficiency during physical activity. These findings emphasize the importance of this often-overlooked condition in HF patients and suggest that identifying CI and adopting personalized treatment strategies such as exercise rehabilitation and rate-adaptive pacing could potentially improve survival in this high-risk group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364344
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364344: Chronotropic Incompetence Predicts Reduced Survival and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data Across HFrEF and HFpEF

Malihe Rezaee, Amir Hossein Behnoush, Mohammad Keykhaei, Mehrdad Mahalleh et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Abstract 4364344: Chronotropic Incompetence Predicts Reduced Survival and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data Across HFrEF and HFpEF

Malihe Rezaee, Amir Hossein Behnoush, Mohammad Keykhaei, Mehrdad Mahalleh, Roozbeh Narimani Javid, Masih Tajdini, Mohammadreza Babaei, Kiarash Tavakoli, Parham Dastjerdi
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronotropic incompetence (CI) is the inability of the heart to increase its rate adequately during activity. It is common in heart failure (HF) patients and is associated with poorer exercise capacity and clinical outcomes. This study systematically examines prognosis and functional outcomes in HF patients with and without CI. Method: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 8, 2025, comparing overall survival and exercise performance in HF patients with and without CI. All-cause mortality was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models based on reconstructed individual patient data. Exercise performance differences were analyzed as mean differences (MD) using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Subgroup and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analyses were also conducted. Results: A total of twenty-one studies were included. CI was associated with a 74% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.04; P < 0.001). Compared to patients without CI, those with CI had significantly lower exercise performance across all parameters: resting heart rate (MD: –6.91 bpm; P < 0.0001), peak heart rate (MD: –34.71 bpm; P < 0.001), heart rate reserve (MD: –28.05 bpm; P < 0.001), exercise duration (MD: –77.68 seconds; P = 0.021), peak workload (MD: –19.15 watts; P < 0.0001), and peak VO2 (MD: –3.31 ml.kg-1.min-1; P < 0.0001). Additionally, VE/VCO2 slope was significantly higher in the CI group (MD: 2.03; P < 0.0001), indicating poorer ventilatory efficiency. Subgroup analysis showed CI was linked to poor survival in both HF patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HR: 1.49 and 2.50, respectively). Additionally, RMST analysis revealed fewer event-free days over five years in patients with CI, with differences of 67 days in the HFrEF subgroup (P < 0.001) and 371 days in the HFpEF subgroup (P < 0.001), compared to their non-CI counterparts. Conclusion: HF patients with CI have poorer survival and reduced functional and ventilatory efficiency during physical activity. These findings emphasize the importance of this often-overlooked condition in HF patients and suggest that identifying CI and adopting personalized treatment strategies such as exercise rehabilitation and rate-adaptive pacing could potentially improve survival in this high-risk group.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center (IR), Tehran Heart Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.