Abstract Sun1108: Development of a Novel Categorization Framework for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) affects roughly 300,000 patients each year in the United States. Compared to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), IHCA remains understudied. OHCA categorization is well established, allowing for efficient and granular quality improvement and clinical research to improve OHCA outcomes. Similar approaches have not been applied to phenotype IHCA despite the abundance of available data from Electronic Medical Records (EMR). We hypothesized that IHCA data collected in the EMR can be used to categorize patients into clinically relevant phenotypes and consequently improve understanding of prognostic risk factors. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania who suffered IHCA. Trained study team members extracted detailed information from the EMR, including the patient’s pre-admission status, hospital course, and the events in the 24 hours leading up to IHCA. The study team reviewed the pre-arrest trajectory of each case to identify phenotypes of pre-arrest deterioration (phenotypes are not mutually exclusive). Clinical criteria for each trajectory were also developed using expert input of study team members and available scientific literature. These phenotypes were iteratively developed, refining or adding phenotype definitions as new patterns emerged. A multidisciplinary panel of cardiac arrest experts reviewed each case until ten cases were classified without the need to modify or add a clinical phenotype. Additional IHCA cases were then categorized using these novel phenotypes. Results: Our cardiac arrest expert panel identified definitions and criteria for nine novel pre-arrest categories using the initial 100 cases (Figure 1). After review of 40 additional IHCA cases, they assigned all patients into at least one pre-arrest category. The most common pre-arrest trajectories were unstable tachyarrhythmia (41/202, 20%), unstable bradycardia (36/202, 18%), and respiratory failure (39/202, 19%). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that IHCA patients can be categorized into clinically relevant phenotypes using EMR-derived criteria. These phenotypes provide insight into pre-arrest trajectory and may help identify prognostic risk factors. By leveraging this categorization, we plan to investigate how these phenotypes are associated with patient outcome and whether they can inform resuscitation strategies or enhance quality improvement efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sun1108
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sun1108: Development of a Novel Categorization Framework for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Brenda Rodriquez, Katherine M. Berg, David Fischer, Oscar Mitchell et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sun1108: Development of a Novel Categorization Framework for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Brenda Rodriquez, Katherine M. Berg, David Fischer, Oscar Mitchell, Kelvin Chen, John C. Greenwood, Aarthi Kaviyarasu, Brandon Tang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) affects roughly 300,000 patients each year in the United States. Compared to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), IHCA remains understudied. OHCA categorization is well established, allowing for efficient and granular quality improvement and clinical research to improve OHCA outcomes. Similar approaches have not been applied to phenotype IHCA despite the abundance of available data from Electronic Medical Records (EMR). We hypothesized that IHCA data collected in the EMR can be used to categorize patients into clinically relevant phenotypes and consequently improve understanding of prognostic risk factors. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania who suffered IHCA. Trained study team members extracted detailed information from the EMR, including the patient’s pre-admission status, hospital course, and the events in the 24 hours leading up to IHCA. The study team reviewed the pre-arrest trajectory of each case to identify phenotypes of pre-arrest deterioration (phenotypes are not mutually exclusive). Clinical criteria for each trajectory were also developed using expert input of study team members and available scientific literature. These phenotypes were iteratively developed, refining or adding phenotype definitions as new patterns emerged. A multidisciplinary panel of cardiac arrest experts reviewed each case until ten cases were classified without the need to modify or add a clinical phenotype. Additional IHCA cases were then categorized using these novel phenotypes. Results: Our cardiac arrest expert panel identified definitions and criteria for nine novel pre-arrest categories using the initial 100 cases (Figure 1). After review of 40 additional IHCA cases, they assigned all patients into at least one pre-arrest category. The most common pre-arrest trajectories were unstable tachyarrhythmia (41/202, 20%), unstable bradycardia (36/202, 18%), and respiratory failure (39/202, 19%). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that IHCA patients can be categorized into clinically relevant phenotypes using EMR-derived criteria. These phenotypes provide insight into pre-arrest trajectory and may help identify prognostic risk factors. By leveraging this categorization, we plan to investigate how these phenotypes are associated with patient outcome and whether they can inform resuscitation strategies or enhance quality improvement efforts.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.