Abstract 4370303: Sacubitril / Valsartan Lowers Ventricular and Atrial Arrhythmia Risk in Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Sacubitril /valsartan, an angiotensin-receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), improves survival in heart failure, yet its impact on clinically significant arrhythmias remains uncertain. Hypothesis: We hypothesised that ARNI therapy reduces ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) and atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL) compared with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) therapy. Methods: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to May 2025. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing ARNI with ACEI / ARB and reporting VT/VF or AF/AFL were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted study-level data with a standardised form. Pooled log-odds ratios (LogOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with the Q statistic. Results: Twenty-three studies (12 randomised, 11 observational) enrolling 20799 participants (10515 ARNI, 9261 control) met inclusion criteria. Mean weighted age was 67.1 years; 32.1 % were women. Baseline left-ventricular ejection fraction averaged 41 % (range 24–62). Guideline-directed medical therapy and baseline arrhythmia were documented in 74% of studies. VT/VF: Seven randomized trials demonstrated fewer ventricular arrhythmia events with ARNI (LogOR –0.23; OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.98; p = 0.03; Q = 3.6, p = 0.73). When all 12 studies reporting VT/VF, including the seven RCTs, were analyzed, the association still favored ARNI but did not reach statistical significance (LogOR –0.37; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.41–1.18; p = 0.18; Q = 44.9, p = 0.02). AF/AFL : Fifteen studies, including both randomized trials and observational studies, demonstrated a 31% risk reduction with ARNI (LogOR –0.37; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.91; p = 0.01; Q = 45.3, p < 0.001). In the randomized subset (seven trials), the effect trended in favor of ARNI but did not reach statistical significance (LogOR –0.09; OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73–1.14; p = 0.42; Q = 16.4, p = 0.13). Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan significantly decreases ventricular arrhythmias in randomised evidence and lowers atrial arrhythmias when observational data are included. These findings support its use to mitigate arrhythmic risk and highlight the need for rhythm-focused randomised trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370303
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370303: Sacubitril / Valsartan Lowers Ventricular and Atrial Arrhythmia Risk in Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Omaima Ali, Habib Yazgi, Murtala Abubakar
Circulation
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4370303: Sacubitril / Valsartan Lowers Ventricular and Atrial Arrhythmia Risk in Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Omaima Ali, Habib Yazgi, Murtala Abubakar
article en

Abstract

Background: Sacubitril /valsartan, an angiotensin-receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), improves survival in heart failure, yet its impact on clinically significant arrhythmias remains uncertain. Hypothesis: We hypothesised that ARNI therapy reduces ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) and atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL) compared with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) therapy. Methods: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from January 2000 to May 2025. Randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing ARNI with ACEI / ARB and reporting VT/VF or AF/AFL were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted study-level data with a standardised form. Pooled log-odds ratios (LogOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models; heterogeneity was assessed with the Q statistic. Results: Twenty-three studies (12 randomised, 11 observational) enrolling 20799 participants (10515 ARNI, 9261 control) met inclusion criteria. Mean weighted age was 67.1 years; 32.1 % were women. Baseline left-ventricular ejection fraction averaged 41 % (range 24–62). Guideline-directed medical therapy and baseline arrhythmia were documented in 74% of studies. VT/VF: Seven randomized trials demonstrated fewer ventricular arrhythmia events with ARNI (LogOR –0.23; OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.98; p = 0.03; Q = 3.6, p = 0.73). When all 12 studies reporting VT/VF, including the seven RCTs, were analyzed, the association still favored ARNI but did not reach statistical significance (LogOR –0.37; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.41–1.18; p = 0.18; Q = 44.9, p = 0.02). AF/AFL : Fifteen studies, including both randomized trials and observational studies, demonstrated a 31% risk reduction with ARNI (LogOR –0.37; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.91; p = 0.01; Q = 45.3, p < 0.001). In the randomized subset (seven trials), the effect trended in favor of ARNI but did not reach statistical significance (LogOR –0.09; OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73–1.14; p = 0.42; Q = 16.4, p = 0.13). Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan significantly decreases ventricular arrhythmias in randomised evidence and lowers atrial arrhythmias when observational data are included. These findings support its use to mitigate arrhythmic risk and highlight the need for rhythm-focused randomised trials.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.